GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
E-invoice Applicability Calculator New
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
Free Daily GST updates on...

GST Case Laws

High Court
Search by Related Tags


Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   6,067 Results

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 04.09.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods, & Service Tax (CGST) 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP had received a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 27.03.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application dated 30.07.2018. (Annexure-1) filed by the...
☗ Fmcg
1. Being aggrieved by the order of Prohibition issued in Form GST INS 03, dated 21.12.2019 by the 1 st respondent-Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST), Jaggaiahpet Nandigama Circle, unit, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada, this writ petition has been preferred. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has advanced solitary contention emphasizing the jurisdiction of the 1st respondent, who passed the order of Prohibition as contemplated under Section 67(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 6, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the ...
☗ Construction


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Mar 6, 2020)

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief : “It is prayed that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring - (a) that the proviso to Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 inserted by Section 100 of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 applies retrospectively from 01.07.2017 and consequently, set aside the demand notice dated 07.02.202...
The petitioner is a company, registered under the Companies Act 1956, with registered office in Mumbai, dealing in Auto Mobile Tyres, Tubes, Flaps, etc. filing regular returns under the Goods and Service Tax Act and Rules framed thereunder. It has a branch run under a Carry and Forward (C & F) Agency, M/s. GNXT Power Corp, which raised tax invoice on 27.02.2020, on a customer dealer located at Kollam. True copy of the tax invoice affixed with dispatched date 02.03.2020 at 12.30 pm to be s...
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Devang Vyas, learned Assistant Solicitor General waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent Nos.1,2 and 3. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the direction issued by respondent Nos.1 and 2 dated ...
Heard Mr. Joseph Kodianthara, the learned Senior Advocate, who appears along with Mr. Joao Mariano Dias for the Petitioner and Ms. Priyanka Kamat, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the communications dated 7th February, 2020 and 17th February, 2020 at Exhibit P-2 and Exhibit P-3, advising the Petitioners to deposit certain amounts towards interest which are stated to be calculated by the system as per the provisions of Section 50 of the ...
Petitioner has filed this writ petition questioning the refund rejection order dated 20.11.2019 passed in Reference No.DC(ST)STUIII/ 3/2018-19 by the respondent No.1. 2. Petitioner is an entity incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 later replaced by the Companies Act, 2013 and engaged in manufacturing and selling of Ready-Mix Concrete. 3. Petitioner had supplied the same to certain registered persons as well as persons, who are SEZ Units, in the financial year 2017-18. According ...


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Mar 5, 2020)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. • At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions,...
☗ Construction


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 5, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Liberty Translines , the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions....
☗ Transportation / Storage