GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GSTR-3B Manual New
GSTR-9 Manual New
GSTR-9C Manual New
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Case Laws Sitemap
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
ITC Reversal Calculator
E-invoice Applicability Calculator
Inverted Duty Refund Calculator
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

About Us

Our Services

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter


GST Case Laws

High Court
Search by Related Tags


Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   6,838 Results

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P10 show cause notice issued to him under Section 74 of the GST Act. Although various contentions are raised in the writ petition in its challenge against the show cause notice, I am of the view that since Ext.P10 is only a show cause notice, against which the petitioner has an effective right to prefer an objection and get the matter adjudicated before the adjudicating authority, an interference with the show cause notice at this stag...


(Kerala High Court | Nov 2, 2020)

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P9 and P10 notices issued to him, prior to the issuance of a show cause notice under Section 73 and 74/ 74 of the GST Act. Although various contentions are raised in the writ petition in its challenge against Exts.P9 and P10 notices, I am of the view that at this stage of the proceedings, where the petitioner is only being requested to pay certain amounts for avoiding a show cause notice that could possibly follow under Section 73/74 ...


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 2, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 23.12.2019, has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application dated 29.03.2019 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, by the Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of “DSLR Cameras&...
☗ Electronic
★ Classification/Supply of Goods
The petitioner, a private limited company which is registered with GST Authorities with the State of Karnataka, has filed this writ petition for a direction to the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, GSTLVO-60 [the respondent] to consider the petitioner's representations dated 3.09.2020 and 10.09.2020, and to unblock the petitioner's Electronic Ledger. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed its Returns in the prescribed form in GSTR...
★ Belated Return
1. The Petitioner has filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, “CPC”), seeking to insert amendments in the Writ Petition. The proposed amendments are as follows; Insertion of Paragraph 4.1 and 4.2 after the existing Paragraph 4: “4.1. The Petitioner is also challenging the proviso to Section 174(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 which provides that tax exemption granted a...
★ GST Exemption
Heard. On the request of the learned Counsel for the parties, the matter is being taken up for final hearing. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by denial of transitioning the credit of ₹ 17,07,673/- after the submission of declaration in Form GST TRAN-1 on 27th December, 2017 in time on Goods and Services Tax Network (“GSTN”) viz. Respondent No.4 and admitted successful filing of the same by the Respondent authorities. Petitioner has, therefore, challenged the action of the Respond...


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Oct 29, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 7 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 24.04.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicants No. 1 to 6 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of additional Input tax Credit (ITC) to the above Applicant as well as other home buyers ...
☗ Construction


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Oct 28, 2020)

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL) Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in criminal complaint No. A.C. No. 22 of 2020 dated 18.08.2020, registered under Sections 132(1)(b)(c) of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Amloh. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is a businessman and has falsely be...
★ Bail Application


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Oct 28, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that under Rule 128 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering alleging that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate on restaurant service when it was reduced from 18% to 5% w.e.f. 15.11.2017 without benefit of ITC and he had increased the base prices of the food items sold by h...
☗ Hotel/hospitality/accomodation
★ Classification/Supply of Goods
These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned show cause notices issued in respect of three assessment years namely 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. 2. Heard Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. By consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. 4.It is the case of the petitioner that ...