Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Case Laws ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,236 cases mapped to 11,807 taggings
Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   3,236 Results

This Writ Petition is filed inter alia for the relief of declaring the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle bearing registration No.KA 01 AE 1227 by respondent No.1 as illegal. The consequential relief of direction to the respondents for release of the said vehicle to the petitioner has also been claimed We have heard Mr. G.Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes (Andhra Pradesh). The a...

Nov 17, 2017  

INOX LEISURE LTD.


(AAR | Gujrat)

The applicant vide letter dated 14.11.2017 informed that they wish to withdraw their application seeking advance ruling and requested to permit the withdrawal of their application. 2. We have considered the request of the applicant and hold that their request can be accepted. O R D E R The application for Advance Ruling dated 04.10.2017 of M/s. Inox Leisure Ltd. is disposed of as withdrawn. ...

Nov 15, 2017  

1. This petition is filed by way of Public Interest Litigation with the prayers, which read as under: “a. Be pleased to admit this petition. b. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no.2 for postponement of the meeting and further if the decisions taken whereof, the same should not be declared publicly till the election is over in the interest of justice...

Nov 15, 2017  

ORDER Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal assisted by Miss Sanyukta Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel representing the respondents. By means of the present writ petition the petitioners have sought the following relief : "(a) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the seizure order dated 25.9.2017 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) as well as the consequential notice dated 26.9.2017 (Annexure No...

Nov 14, 2017  

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to notify an authority for advance ruling as contemplated under Section 96 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Ordinance, 2017. The apprehension of the petitioner in the writ petition is essentially that, although the statutory provisions contemplate an authority for advance rulings within the State, the respondents have not constituted the authority, and hence, the petitioner is not able to approach an auth...

Nov 9, 2017  

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents no. 5 and 6 as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents no. 1 to 4. The petitioner is a partnership firm and had applied for registration under GST on 27.6.2017, but mistakenly provided the PAN number of one of the partner of the firm. When the mistake was realized, the petitioner then again applied for registration on 14.8.2017 for registration. This time giving the...

Nov 8, 2017  

1.0. Rule. Shri Dhaval Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.1 and Shri Mahavir Gadhvi, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.2. In the facts and circumstance of the case and with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, present petition is taken up for final hearing today. 2.0. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed f...

Nov 2, 2017  

The application for advance ruling of M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. was heard on 17.10.2017 on the issue as to whether the application is fit for admission or not. Shri Shivrajan Kalyanaraman was requested on that day to submit the reasons / provisions on following issues by 23/25.10.2017. (i) Whether the authority is within jurisdiction to admit application especially on the issue of ‘place of supply’? (ii) Whether the issue is related to Customs or is related to...

Oct 30, 2017  

The petitioner is aggrieved with the detention of goods at Exhibit P4. The goods are granite purchased by the petitioner from Tamil Nadu and transported to Karamana at Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner submits that the transport is effected for the purpose of building a residential house; the permit of which is produced at Exhibit P1 and the plan at Exhibit P2. The detention, as is seen from Exhibit P4, was for the reason that the notice issued is that of the Value Added Tax period and also ...

Oct 27, 2017  

A consignment of motor vehicle chasis that was being stock transferred at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and the vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also...

Oct 26, 2017