GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
Classification by CTA

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8130462634

GST Case Laws

0
Citation
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,654 Results

SANIKA DEVELOPERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | May 9, 2019)

M/s Sanika Developers, Arjun Empire, S-201, 2nd Floor, Congress Road, Tilakwadi, Belagavi, Karnataka-590006, (herein after referred to as ‘Applicant’) having GSTIN number 29ABKFS7231G1ZV, have filed an application, on 04-01-2019, for advance ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01. They also enclosed copies of challans for ₹ 10,000/- (CGST of ₹ 5,000/- paid vide CIN SBIN19012...
☗ Construction

A RAYMOND FASTENERS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 9, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. A Raymond Fasteners India Pvt. Ltd, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follo...
☗ Other
1. Heard Mr. D.K. Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. In this case, the petitioners have already paid the amounts of tax and penalty as computed by the respondents. Under the circumstances, the respondents shall release the detained goods as well as the conveyance, subject to each of the petitioners filing a solemn undertaking before this court to the effect that the petitioners shall make good ...

KRISHNA AUTOMOBILES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 9, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Aditya Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, who appears for respondent no.1 to 3 and learned standing counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-2 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 30.6.2018 and he is permitted t...
1. Heard Mr. Paresh Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Kamal Trivedi, learned Advocate General for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, by way of an interim measure, the respondents are directed to release the detained goods together with the conveyance, subject to the petitioner paying the tax and penalty as computed by the respondent authorities and also subject to filing a solemn undertaking be...

BEENA MEDICAL AGENCIES vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | May 9, 2019)

1. Mr. Tushar Hemani, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that vide order dated 6.3.2019, the first appellate authority has allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner against cancellation of its registration and has directed the second respondent to restore registration number being Registration No.24AACFB8930AIZO after due verification. It was submitted that however, the order passed by the first appellate authority is not being complied with. 2. This court has also heard Mr. S...

KRUSHNA NAVGHAN KARAVADRA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | May 9, 2019)

1. Rule. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the controversy involved in this case, which lies in a very narrow compass, the matter was taken up for final hearing today. 2. By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged a letter dated 11.3.2019 (AnnexureA to the petition) issued by the second respondent – State Tax Officer continuing the instructions of restraining transfer...
Mr. Tushar Hemani, learned advocate with Mr. Apurva Mehta and Mr. Vijay Patel, learned advocates for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to an order dated 9.2.2018 passed by this court in Special Civil Application No.726/2018, wherein, similar question of facts and law are involved and this Court had issued notice. Under the circumstances, issue Notice, returnable on 19.6.2019. By way of ad interim relief, the impugned order dated 27.4.2019 (AnnexureD to the pet...
1. Heard Mr. D.K. Puj, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Kamal Trivedi, learned Advocate General for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, by way of an interim measure, the respondents are directed to release the detained goods together with the conveyance, subject to the petitioner paying the tax and penalty as computed by the respondent authorities and also subject to filing a solemn undertaking befor...
1. Heard Mr. D.K. Puj, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Kamal Trivedi, learned Advocate General for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, by way of an interim measure, the respondents are directed to release the detained goods together with the conveyance, subject to the petitioner paying the tax and penalty as computed by the respondent authorities and also subject to filing a solemn undertaking befor...