Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Case Laws ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,236 cases mapped to 11,807 taggings
Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   3,236 Results

1. The present Report dated 31.01.2020 has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line with Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application dated 22.05.2019 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent alleging profiteering in respect of supply of 'Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography f...

Sep 8, 2020  

1. The present Report dated 26.02.2020 has been received by this Authority from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line with Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP has received a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti- Profiteering in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017...

Sep 8, 2020  

Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Sri M.K. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer:- (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 14.04.2020 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no.3. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2...

Sep 7, 2020  

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P11 order of detention, whereby a consignment of goods transported at his instance was detained by the 3rd respondent on the ground that there was no valid e-way bill covering the transportation of goods in terms of Section 138 of the GST Rules. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and subm...

Sep 7, 2020  

M/s. Bangalore Medical Systems, #5 866,1st Floor, S.M.Road, T.Dasarahalli, Bengaluru-560057 (hereinafter referred to “the applicant”) and having a GSTIN 29ADRPR1448K1ZS, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act, KGST Act and IGST Act. 2. The app...

Sep 7, 2020  

Heard. 2. Aggrieved by the action of respondent nos.3 to 5 in issuing show cause notice and subsequently canceling the registration of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CGST Act') and thereafter refusing to revoke the cancellation of registration, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition. 3. The petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of trading in bath fittings and sanitary ware. I...

Sep 7, 2020  

Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. AK Bhowmik, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. K De, learned Addl. GA appearing for the respondents. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the seizure/detention of goods/materials by the Superintendent of State Taxes (the proper officer), Churaibari Enforcement Wing, North Tripura by the order dated 17.02.2020 on the ground that e-Way bills tendered for the goods in movement stood exp...

Sep 3, 2020  

Heard Mr.Jnanesh Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.S.Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CGST & Central Excise through Video Conferencing mode. 2. The petitioner-Company in this writ petition prays for a direction to set aside the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Cuttack Division (OP No.1) in rejecting the refund of unutilized ITC to the petitioner-Company accumulated taking into account of inverted duty structure. The p...

Sep 3, 2020  

The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order dated 03.07.2020 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, Mughal Sarai, Chandauli. The order demands the tax liability of the petitioner and also imposes a penalty. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the order is beyond jurisdiction, inasmuch as, the proceedings are culminated in the impunged order dated 03.07.2020, arose out of Section 129 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The submission ...

Sep 2, 2020  

Heard Mr. A. Sanganeria, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State accepts notice for opposite party nos.1 to 3. 3. Mr. A. Sanganeria, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition being identical to W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020, the same may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 18.02.2020, passed in W.P.(C) No.5933 o...

Sep 2, 2020