Payment Failure - GST Library by TaxReply.com
Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Have a Query?      Refer and Earn?      Other Services
Login | Register    

New GST Input-Output Set off Rules w.e.f. 01.02.2019

    

Cabinet approves creation of the National Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT)

    

Delhi High Court stays demand in the case of Hindustan Unilever (HUL) for Profiteering imposed by NAA

    

Major decisions taken in 32nd GST Council Meeting

    

Bank account details are not required for GST Registration now

    

Standard Operating Procedure on TDS updated as on 27.12.2018 issued by CBIC

    

Guidelines and procedure of applications for financial assistance under the Central Scheme named Seva Bhoj Yojna for reimbursement of central tax and Central Government share of integrated tax paid on the purchase of raw food items.

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Rate changes and clarification in Goods

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - GST rate on services

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Certain important issues referred by GST Council to various Committees / GoM

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - In-Principle approval given for Law Amendments

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Formation of Group of Minister as Recommended by the GST Council

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Recommendations in Return Filing and Procedural Changes

    

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Recommendations in GST Rate Changes

    

Directorate General of GST Intelligence arrested the promoters of two Mumbai-based textile firms

    

Prime Minister promises relief in GST on many products from 28% to 18%

    

Development of new return filing system and sharing of data by GSTN with tax authorities

    

FAQ on GSTR-9C released by ICAI Indirect Tax Committee

    

Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion

    

Gujrat High Court admits appeal on last date to avail ITC for July 2017 to March 2018

     View all
View all
Home       Login    Pay

GST Case Laws
TaxReply.com - Free Tax updates for All
GST Library TM
About GST Library
GST Library Pricing
Free Trial
Full Site Search
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules - Latest Amendments
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Notifications / Circulars Press Releases +
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Case Laws
↳ GST AAR Orders
↳ GST AAAR Orders
↳ GST NAA Orders
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
↳ E-way Bill Notificaitons
↳ E-way Bill News
↳ E-way Bill Rules
↳ E-way Bill FAQ
GST Rates for goods and services
GST Calendar / Due Dates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST News / Articles
Finance Bill
Advance Search Tool
TR Citation -TR-
Court
State
Classification of Goods / Services
Related Section / Rule / Notification / HSN / SAC   OR     OR  
In Favour of   
Date (From)
Date (To)
Petitioner / Applicant / Respondent's Name
Free-Text Search
Sort By

Text Search option  


GST Case Laws

Found: 331 Result  

SURYA PRAKASH LOONKER vs. EXCEL RASAYAN PVT. LTD. [2019 (1) TR 2]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 16-01-2019 | In favour of Revenue | Order No.2/2019

1. The present Report, dated 04.09.2018, has been received on 07.09.2018 from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 22.02.2018 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee, constituted under Rule 123 (1) of the above Rules alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of reduction in the GS

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. [2019 (1) TR 1]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 02-01-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.1/2019

1. The present Report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No, 2 i.e. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of it’s meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteer

KERALA STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. JANSON [2018 (12) TR 10]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 27-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.26/2018

1. The present report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by

KERALA STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. LORENZO VITRIFIED TILES PVT. LTD [2018 (12) TR 11]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 27-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.27/2018

1. The present report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it’s meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on t

STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. AHUJA RADIOS [2018 (12) TR 12]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 27-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.28/2018

1. The present Report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. ASIAN PAINTS LTD. [2018 (12) TR 13]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 27-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.29/2018

1. The present Report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering b

DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. RAJ & COMPANY [2018 (12) TR 14]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 27-12-2018 | In favour of Revenue | Order No.25/2018

1. This report dated 08.08.2018, has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that on the receipt of a reference dated 27.02.2018, where a complaint was filed with the Secretary National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), alleging that certain major manufacturers of Fast Moving Goods Consumer Goods (FMCGs) including M/s. Garnier Laboratories Ltd.

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. ASIAN GRANITO INDIA LTD. [2018 (12) TR 5]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 24-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.21/2018

1. The present report dated 27.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteerin

STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. PEPS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD [2018 (12) TR 6]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 24-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.22/2018

1. The present report dated 27.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that The Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering

STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD [2018 (12) TR 7]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 24-12-2018 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.23/2018

1. The present Report dated 27.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that The Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering