GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale New

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Free Daily GST updates on...
twitter
8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   5,880 Results

2COMS FOUNDATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 27, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. 2COMS FOUNDATION, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. Whether the reimbursement received by 2COMS foundation (applicant by industry partner, for the stipend paid to students, attract GST? At the out...

RAMESH KUMAR PATODIA vs. CITI BANK NA AND OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Jun 24, 2022)

1. The borrower has filed this Writ petition praying for a declaration that the interest component of the Equated Monthly Instalments (for short “EMI”) of the loan granted by the respondent Bank is exempted from levy of Integrated Goods and Service Tax (for short “IGST”) and for a direction upon the Bank and the IGST authorities to refund the IGST collected from the petitioner. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as follows- Petitioner i...
1. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) vide Interim Order No. 34/2020 dated 11.12.2020 in this matter has given the following order:- i. “It is observed that the above provision of the RERA Act, 2016 makes it mandatory for a real estate developer/promoter to maintain separate bank accounts for each of his projects registered separately under the RERA Act, 2016. In the case of the Respondent, the above provision implies that he was required to maintain four separate escrow...
1. The present Report dated 26.06.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of construction service supplied by t...
The Instant Report dated 28 08.2020 received on 31 08.2020 has been furnished by Applicant No 17 i.e Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case, are that a reference was received on 30.08.2018 by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering to conduct a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Rules 2017, based on two applications dated 17 07 2018 and 12.05.2018 filed by...
1. The present report dated 31.12.2020, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017 pursuant to National Anti-Profiteering Authority's (NAA) Interim Order No. 15/2020 dated 20.4.2020 under Rule 133 (4) of the Rules, 2017, which directed as follows:- i. The issues of common input tax credit shall be investigated by the DGAP and a detail...

DUBAI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 23, 2022)

1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same, provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [herei...

DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING AND OTHERS vs. L'OREAL INDIA PVT. LTD.


(National Anti-Profiteering Authority | Jun 23, 2022)

The Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as DGAP) has submitted a report dated 28.8.2020 under Rule 133(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules) in the matter relating to M/s L’Oreal India Pvt. Ltd., A-Wing, 8th Floor, Marathon Futurex, N.M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai ­400013 (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent” also). The aforesaid report dated 28.8.2020 was submitted by DGAP pu...
1. The Present Report dated 31.03.2021 had been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. 2. The DGAP vide the above said Report dated 31.03.2021 has inter-alia stated the following:- i. The Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, received 4 Applications under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, filed by Applicant No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 alleging pr...
1. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) vide Interim Order No. 28/2020 dated 27.11.2020 in this matter had passed the following order:- “21. We have carefully considered the Report furnished by the DGAP, the submissions made by the Respondent and the other material placed on record. On examining the various submissions, the observations of this Authority are as follows:- a) The DGAP, in Para 16 of his report, has stated that the Respondent had entered into an...