GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Case Laws Sitemap
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
E-invoice Applicability Calculator New
Inverted Duty Refund Calculator New
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

About Us

Our Services

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   6,287 Results

CHANDRA SAIN vs. U.O.I.,MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 22, 2022)

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Shiv P. Shukla, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.3 to 6. 2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.02.2020 whereby the registration of the petitioner was cancelled as well as the appellate order dated 06.09.2022 whereby the appeal was dismissed as being beyond the prescribed period of limitation. 3. The facts, in brief, are that the petit...
This anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint No. V(15)273/AE/UDR/2020-21 under Section 132(1)(a) (f)(h)(j) & (k) r/w Section 132 (1)(I)(i) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Section 20 of Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner is being sought to be implicated in a false case only because he is son of th...
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The vehicle of this petitioner-manufacturer company was detained by the Respondent-Central Tax Authorities in exercise of the powers under Section 129 of the CGST Act and Rules framed thereunder. The vehicle was released upon deposit of entire amount of tax and penalty. Thereafter, the petitioner approached this Court with the following reliefs: (a) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, holding and declaring that in the fact...

KMV PROJECTS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Sep 16, 2022)

M/s. KMV Projects Limited, (hereinafter referred to as ‘The applicant’), H.No.1-1166/9D, 4th Floor, AIWAN-E-SHAHI ROAD, AIWAN-E-SHAHI Colony, Kalaburagi-585102 having GSTIN 29AADCK0785C1ZL have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs.5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act. 2. Th...
1. The following substantive reliefs have been sought by the petitioner in the writ petition: “a) To declare Rule 159 and sub rules (1) (5) and (6) ultra vires to constitution; b) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus whereby setting aside the order dated 14.08.2020 & 28.09.2020 passed by the Respondent 3;” 2. Mr T.P.S. Kang, who appears on behalf of the petitioners, at the outset, says that he does not wish to press re...
1. The petitioner has sought the following substantial reliefs: “a) quash and set aside the impugned order dated 22.02.2022 passed by the Jt. Comnr.; b) quash and set aside the order of cancellation of RC dated 06.08.2021 and the order of rejection of revocation application dated 08.12.2021 be also set aside; c) restore the RC of the petitioner with immediate effect; d) issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, order or direction.” 2. Notice in this writ peti...

DARSHAN SINGH NAINWAL vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND


(Uttarakhand High Court | Sep 15, 2022)

Heard. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner, an assessee of Goods and Service Tax, has prayed as follows:- “A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order passed by respondent no. 2 on 29.04.2022 (contained as Annexure No. 1 to this petition)” 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he is having a contractor license for the year 2016-17 but he was not carrying out the services of a contractor but he was using his contract...

UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Sep 14, 2022)

M/s. United Breweries Limited (herein after referred to as 'Applicant'), Level 4, UB Tower, UB City, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru-560 001, having GSTIN 29AAACU6053C1ZH, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs.5,000/- each under the CGST Act, KGST Act. 2. The applicant submitted that the...

MYNTRA DESIGNS PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Sep 14, 2022)

M/s. Myntra Designs Private Limited (herein after referred to as 'Applicant' or Myntra Sy. No.8 to 14 & 55, Alyssa Begonia Clover, Embassy Tech Village, Outer Ring Road, Devaribisanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru Urban -560 103, having GSTIN 29AAECM9636P1ZJ, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging th...

EBERSPAECHER SUETRAK BUS CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEMS I..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Sep 14, 2022)

M/s. Eberspaecher Suetrak Bus Climate Control Systems India Pvt. Ltd., herein after referred to as 'Applicantl, Survey No.25/1, Devalapura Village, Angondanahalli Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bengaluru Rural, Karnataka - 560 067, having GSTIN 29AACCE3922E1ZV, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs.5,0...