GST Library
Login | Register
Subscription
GST News
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
GST Videos
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale New

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   5,716 Results

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the respondent in Order No.19/2021-2022 dated 17.03.2022 passed under Section 129(3) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and to quash the same as passed without considering the objections dated 15.03.2022 filed by the petitioner and also passed contrary to Section 129(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Se...
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the action of the respondent GST concerned denying the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by their impugned order dated 27th December, 2021 to the petitioner on purchase of the goods in question from the suppliers and asking the petitioners to pay the penalty and interest under the relevant provisions of GST Act, on the ground that the registration of the suppliers ...
1. Petitioner by this writ petition has challenged the impugned order dated 02.02.2022 passed by appropriate authority under Section 73(9) of Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, making demand under the “DRC-07”. 2. Mr. Bhishma Ahluwalia, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturer of iron and steel goods, avails the facilities of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the CGST/ SGST laws. Petitioner is continuousl...
This petition has been filed for, in effect, modification of an order dated December 7, 2021 as subsequently altered by an order of March 23, 2022 in WP (C) No.344 of 2021. 2. This may be a case of the petitioner herein having cried wolf without justifiable cause in the past for the petitioner’s more worthy subsequent plea to be somewhat diluted by the previous conduct. By the order dated December 7, 2021, the petitioning assessee was permitted to pay the entire outstanding amount o...
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Digvijay Nath Dubey, learned counsel representing the respondent No. 1 and Sri Sanjay Sarin, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel representing the respondent No. 2. Admittedly, against the order which is under challenge in this writ petition, a statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 is available and as such, submission of learned counsel for the respondents is that this writ petition ought not...
1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the assessee and learned Standing Counsel for the revenue. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal), Commercial Tax, Sonbhadra dated 12.10.2021 in Appeal No. GST - 47 of 2021 for the period 2019-20. By that order, that Appeal Authority has rejected as time barred the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 28.02.2019, passed by the Proper Officer, cancelling the petitione...

KPC PROJECTS LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 4, 2022)

Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The Present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively) by M/s. KPC Projects Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. In view of the constr...

KPC PROJECTS LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 4, 2022)

Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The Present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively) by M/s. KPC Projects Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. In view of the constr...

BARANJ COAL MINES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 4, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. BARANJ COAL MINES PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions: Question 1 - Whether the activity carried out by the Applicant under the Agreement is supply of Goods or is a supply of ...

MADHAV COPPER LIMITED vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | May 4, 2022)

1. The matter was taken up for further hearing today. We have heard Mr. Mihir Joshi, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Chetan Pandya, the learned advocate appearing for the writ applicant, Mr. Vinay Bairagar, the learned AGP appearing for the respondents Nos.1 and 2 respectively and Mr. Pranav Desai, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 – Bank of Baroda. 2. To a larger extent, the parties have been able to arrive at some consensus to facilitate this Court t...