GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Case Laws Sitemap
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
E-invoice Applicability Calculator New
Inverted Duty Refund Calculator New
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

About Us

Our Services

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   6,287 Results

Heard learned advocate Mr.Varis V. Isani for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Trupesh Kathiriya for the respondents. 1. By this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : “A. The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order restraining the learned Respondent authorities from taking action against the...

SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Sep 14, 2022)

Heard Sri Mahesh Rai Chanda Nai, learned counsel representing Sri G. Arun Showri, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes appearing for respondents 2,5 & 6, and Sri Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 3 & 4. Perused the record. 2. The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the responden...

PARVEEZ AHMAD BABA vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Sep 13, 2022)

1. The petitioner is aggrieved of and has challenged the following orders:- i) License dated 15th May, 2019 issued by the Designated Officer/State Licensing Authority under the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 [“the Act”] in favour of respondent No.5 in respect of “Samci Restaurant”, Residency Road, Srinagar. ii) Communication bearing No.FDA/FSSA/SGR/313-316 dated 2nd December, 2020 issued by respondent No.4, whereby the petitioner is intimated that the licen...
Heard Sri Shubham Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel. By means of present petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 27.5.2022 passed by the respondent no. 2 by which the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and orders of cancellation of registration of the petitioner has been upheld by holding that the appeal to be barred by the limitation, loosing site of the fact that order of cancellation of registration w...
1. Since the issue involved in these Writ Petitions being one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by this Common Order. W.P. No. 17958 of 2022 is taken as a lead petition in deciding the issues involved. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed assailing the Endorsement, dated 28.05.2022, issued by the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Kadapa-I Circle, Kadapa, rejecting the request of the Petitioner for refund along with interest, as illegal, improper and incorrect. 3...

KAUSHAL KADEL vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Sep 8, 2022)

1. These intra-Court appeals at the instance of the writ petitioner is directed against the common order dated 22nd September, 2021 passed in W.P.A. No.11708 of 2021 and W.P.A. No.11710 of 2021. In the said writ petitions, the appellant had challenged the adjudication order passed by the respondent authority primarily on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice that the full text of the order was not communicated to the appellant and it is a non-speaking order. During the...

BHARAT GORDHANDAS PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 8, 2022)

ORDER 1. The applicant, presently in custody, has filed regular bail application under Section 439of the Cr.P.C., in connection with File No. ACST/U-5/J K Traders/2021-22, registered with office of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Ahmedabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 132(1)(A), 132(1)(B) and 132(1)(C) of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as ‘the GST Act’.) and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referr...

BABU JI TRADERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 8, 2022)

ORDER The present writ petition is directed against the show cause notice dated 17.08.2022 in G.S.T. MOV 07 issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, STO (MC) Commissioner Tax, Etah as also the form GST MOV-2 dated 13.08.2022 of the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad) Etah. Various objections have been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner about the jurisdiction of the Commercial Tax Officer to issue show cause notice and the competence of the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad...

SUDAMA BAJPAI vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 8, 2022)

1. Heard Sri Lal Mani Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 705 of 2018, under Sections 417, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Bilhaur, District Kanpur Nagar during pendency of the trial in the Court below. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R....

NITIN GOYAL vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Sep 8, 2022)

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. 2. In paragraph 23 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents. 3. The allegations are of fraud related to GST invoices and getting credits to the extent of Rs. 1,10,35,701/- (Rs. One crore ten lacs, thirty-five thousand seven hundred and one). 4. Mr. Vinod Ghai, Ld. Senior Advocate appearing for the pet...