Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Case Laws ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,286 cases mapped to 12,093 taggings
Search by Related Tags


Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   3,286 Results


(AAR | Andhra Pradesh)

M/s PARSAN BROTHERS(hereinafter also referred as an applicant), having GSTIN 37AAAEFP0090P1ZV are holders of Special Warehouse License No. 14/2016, issued under Section 58 (A) of The Customs Act, 1962 for storage of duty free ship stores imported without payment of duty for supply to Indian Naval / Coast Guard ships and Ocean going merchant ships. 2. The applicant seeks Advance Ruling under Section 104 of CGST & SGST Acts' 2017for the following questions:- i. Whether they are ...

Jan 25, 2018  

Heard Shri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripahti, learned Special Counsel for the State. The petitioner has come up before this Court with a prayer that his goods along with vehicle may be released. The penalty order has been passed on 27.12.2017 under Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST Act. The petitioner states that he has already deposited part of the amount as has been computed in the notice but there is a demand against him for penalty which is equ...

Jan 25, 2018  

ORDER The petitioner was carrying goods from Chhattisgarh to State of U.P. The petitioner submits that the goods were duly supported with all necessary documents including E-Way Bill No.1. The demand for E-Way Bill No.2 is not required. Learned Standing Counsel has also received instructions that no penalty order has been passed. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the goods of the petitioner along with the Vehicle No.CG15AC0258 may be released without demanding an...

Jan 24, 2018  

The instructions have been received by the learned Standing Counsel. No penalty order has been passed against the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is that it was carrying goods in the nature of Tobacco from Delhi to Rajasthan and when the goods were seized the petitioner was able to present the E-Way Bill from the State of Rajasthan. The only allegation for seizure of the goods at Ghaziabad is that the Transit Declaration Form was not there. Other than that no violation of the provi...

Jan 24, 2018  

When this Court entertained a doubt as to whether the petitioners in this writ petition can maintain a joint writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition in so far as it relates to the second petitioner, without prejudice to the right of the second petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioners is granted. 3....

Jan 24, 2018  

Heard the learned counsel on either side. 2. By consent of both the parties the main Writ petition is taken up forfinal disposal. 3. The petitioner was levied with interest tax. The demand raised by the respondent was accepted by the petitioner and the same was also duly paid. However, the petitioner is still liable to pay interest thereon. Thesaid amount comes to ₹ 3,48,735/-. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he had already paid 25% of the said a...

Jan 24, 2018  

Heard Sri Tarun Gulati learned counsel assisted by Sri Rohan Gupta learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Apoorva Hajela learned counsel assisted by Sri Ashok Singh learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017...

Jan 24, 2018  

Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. 2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1802 of 2017, directing expeditious completion of the adjudication of the matter and permitting release of the goods detained pending adjudication, in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services ...

Jan 23, 2018  

ORDER Application seeking permission to argue in person is allowed. Having heard the petitioner-in-person, we are not inclined to enter into the merits of the case at his instance. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. ...

Jan 22, 2018  

Petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the manufacture and sale of surgical gloves. They are registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (the CGST Act) and the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act (the SGST Act). 2. It is stated by the petitioner that one consignment of surgical gloves sent by the petitioner to three parties for quality appraisal on job work basis against Ext.P1 series delivery chalans has been detained by the respondent, in exercise of the powe...

Jan 18, 2018