GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
HSN Guide 2022

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8130462634

GST Case Laws

0
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,862 Results

1.00. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following main relief :- “8(B). Issue appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the action of applying seal to the premises of the petitioner i.e. principal place of business of the petitioner and the respondents authorities may be directed to open the seal to the premises of the petitioner i.e. principal place of business of petitioner at the ea...
ORDER Learned counsel for the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST), prays for time for filing a detailed counter-affidavit in the matter. In the present case the petitioner has been saddled with the interest amount of ₹ 19,59,721/- for filing the delayed GSTR-3B Returns for the period of February and March, 2018. The screen shots of the GSTN Portal has been brought on record by way of Annexures-4 and 4/1 to the writ application, which show that the due date for payment of the ret...

VIKAS GOEL vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND ..


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jul 24, 2019)

Petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in a complaint case bearing No. COMA-137 dated 13.11.2018, titled as 'Shankar Prasad Sarma Versus MICA Industries and others', under Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 10 of the IGST in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017. Notice of motion was issued. Learned counsel appeared and filed a reply on behalf o...

ESKAG PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jul 23, 2019)

An Appeal filed under Section 100(1) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/ Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by Eskag Pharma Pvt. Ltd., AG-112, 8th Floor, Suite No. 804, Baishakhi, Salt Lake, Sector-II, Kolkata- 700 091 1. This Appeal has been filed by Eskag Pharma Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) on 29.04.2019 against Advance Ruling No. 46/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 26.03.2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Ad...
☗ Pharma
The Revenue has filed these two intra court appeals aggrieved by the orders dated 13.6.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court directing the Assessing Authority who is the present appellant before us to decide the objections of the Assessee dated 10.5.2019 and 29.3.2019 filed in pursuance of the Notice demanding interest issued under Section 50 of the CGST Act by the present Appellant on 2.5.2019 and 14.3.2019 to the Respondent/Assessee. 2. The interest demand on the alleged...
O R D E R The petitioner has sought for following reliefs: i. Issue writ holding that Section 50(1) of Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 and Section 50(1) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax, 2017 is unconstitutional to the extent that the burden of interest is imposed on the Input Tax Credit Available to the Credit of the petitioner. ii. Issue writ or order or direction quashing the email dated 04.03.2019 bearing OC.No.76/2019 (Annexure-J) demanding payments. ...
1. Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the assessee has raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the present writ petition. 2. At present, learned Standing Counsel states that in absence of the Tribunal having been constituted by the Union, the assessee as well as the revenue authorities are compelled to approach this Court by filing such writ petition against the order of the first appellate authority. 3. Learned Standing Counsel is permitted to impl...

RAJEEV TRADERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 22, 2019)

1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Certified copy of the impugned order has thus been brought on record. In view thereof, the defect stands removed. 3. Heard Sri U.K. Pandey, assisted by Sri Prabhat Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner-assessee and Sri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 4. The present writ petition has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner (SIB), Commercial Tax...
1. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. Counter-affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is already on record. 3. The Petitioner is a company having its registered office in New Delhi, engaged in the manufacturing and trading of water purifiers. It is duly registered with the Excise Department and under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Rules under which it is entitled to take the CENVAT credit on input used for manufacturing of the fini...
Heard Shri Amitabh Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. Facts in brief of the present case are that the petitioner is a registered dealer having GSTIN No.09ABYFS0479C1ZN under the relevant provisions of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and deals in purchase and sale of Aluminium Section, Aluminium Sheets and their related hardware goods. During the year 2017-18, one of the consignment of the sale made by the petitioner vide Tax Invoice No.GR-17-18/...