GST Library
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
HSN Guide 2022

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
Free GST updates via...

GST Case Laws

High Court
Search by Related Tags


Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,862 Results

1) The petitioners being aggrieved by the impugned notification No. 13/2017 Central Excise (N.T) dated 09.06.2017 and impugned Circular No. C. No. II (39) 04/ET/CCO/SH/2019, dated 20.02.2019 issued by the Joint Commissioner, Office of the Chief Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax & Customs, Guwahati Zone, Shillong directing for the shifting of the Chief Commissioner’s Office (CCO) from Shillong to Guwahati, have assailed the same by way of this instant writ petition. The pleaded ca...
This petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugns the investigation initiated, and steps taken, by Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax against the Petitioner under Section 64 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax, 2002 (“VAT Act”) including summons issued to the Managing Director of the Petitioner for recording of a statement under Section 14 of that Act for such investigation. The challenge is essentially on the basis that by reason of the Constitution (On...
This appeal involves interpretation of Rule 9(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') regarding furnishing of clarification, information and documents in relation to an application for registration made under Section 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. The writ petition W.P (C) No.7445/2019 was filed by M/s.West Bengal Lottery Stockists Syndicate Private Limited,...
Heard Shri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1,2 and 4. The petitioner has challenged the vires of Rules 117 and 120A of CGST Rules, which read as hereunder:- "117(1). Every registered person entitled to take credit of input tax under Section 140 shall, within ninety days of the appointed day, submit a declaration electronically in FOR...
Heard Shri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gyan Prakash, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri K.J. Shukla and Shri R.C. Shukla learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 6, Shri Vikas Chandra Tripathi, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Shri Nimai Dass, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel, Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the State. Shri Navin Sinha, lear...


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jul 18, 2019)

1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and MPSGT Act respectively) by M/s. NMDC Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a specific mention of the dissimilar provision is made, a ref...


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Goa | Jul 18, 2019)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the SGST Act and CGST Act) by the Chief Electrical Engineer, Goa, Electricity Department, 4th Floor, Vidhyut Bhavan, Near Police Headquarter, Panaji Goa - 403001 seeking an Advance Ruling in respect of the GST rate applicable for various works/activity undertaken by the Chief Electrical Engineer, Goa as listed below: ...
Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.39969 of 2018 is the appellant herein, challenging dismissal of the writ petition through the judgment dated 22nd January,2019. Respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. Exts.P1 to P8 orders of assessment were challenged in the writ petition by raising a contention that the proceedings of the assessments were initiated beyond the period of limitation stipulated under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act,2003('KVAT Act' for ...
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the detention order dated 06.06.2019 and penalty notice dated 06.06.2019 broadly on the ground of jurisdiction of respondent no.2/Commissioner of State Tax, U.P., Lucknow under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in seizing the consignment of goods, which were coming from Panipat (Haryana) to Lucknow. Facts in brief of the present case a...
1.00. As common question of law arise in both these petition and as in both these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the provisions of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Notification and Circular issued thereunder, by which the inverted tax structure refund of excess duty is not granted, the same are heard, decided and disposed of by this common order. 2.00. By way of Special Civil Application No.16213 of 2018, petitioner – Shabnam Petrofils Pvt. Ltd. has prayed for...