GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
Classification by CTA

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8130462634

GST Case Laws

0
Citation
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,594 Results

1. A report dated 31.07.2018, was received from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 stating that a reference dated 28.02.2018 was forwarded by the State level Screening Committee of Maharashtra to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, recommending investigation in respect of an application alleging profiteering by the Respondent in the course of “Courier Service&...
☗ Service (other)

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TA.. vs. TTK PRESTIGE LIMITED


(National Anti-Profiteering Authority | May 2, 2019)

1. This Report, dated 14.01.2019, has been received by this Authority from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application dated 29.08.2018 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering constituted under Rule 128 of the above Rules alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate from...
☗ Other

ELECTRONIC PALACE vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 2, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishna Agrawal and Shri K.J. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017 and he has filed his complete application for the ...
ORDER Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari and Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017 and he has filed his complete application fo...

GLOBE AGENCIES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 2, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Aditya Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devendra Gupta who appears for respondent no.1 to 3, Shri R.C. Shukla learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and 5 and learned standing counsel for the respondent no.6. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-2 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entert...
ORAL ORDER 1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with arrest memo dated 18.3.2019 and F.No.DGCEI/AZU/12(4)73/2018-19 issued under Section 69 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 3. Learned APP appea...

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & OTHERS


(Uttarakhand High Court | May 2, 2019)

Heard Mr. M.P. Devanath, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vikas Pande, learned Standing Counsel for the State, and, with their consent, this appeal is being disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the appellant-writ petitioner-a cement manufacturing unit-seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the Circular dated 02.01.2018; a writ of mandamus to quash the conditions imposed at Sl. Nos.12 and 13 of the Circular dated 02.01.2018 by hold...

SHRI JAYESH ANILKUMAR DALAL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | May 1, 2019)

2. The applicant Shri Jayesh Anilkumar Dalal (GSTIN: 24AAVPD9061B1ZS) has given following queries for advance ruling: “Whether or not my supply of services in the nature as mentioned in point 12(B), provided to Local Authorities, Urban Development Authority, Dist. Panchayat R&B Div. and other Government Departments which are entrusted with the functions mentioned under article 243G and 243W of the Constitution of India can be termed as “Pure Services” as referred in ...
☗ Services (other)
1.Having heard counsels appearing for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this petition has been preferred to get input tax credit of ₹ 1,37,1331.28/-, for which Form GST TRAN-I has to be filled up. The said form can be filled up on a portal opened by the respondents. 2.In several matters, this Court has observed that the petitioner has to prefer an application before the Nodal Officer and the Nodal Officer, in turn, will send the request o...

RAMBAGH PALACE HOTELS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Apr 30, 2019)

The issue raised by M/s Rambagh palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 (hereinafter the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Section 97 (2) (a)(d) given as under : a. classification of any goods or services or both; d. admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid; Further, the applicant being a registered person (GSTIN is 08AAACH6899P1ZL as per the declaration given by him in Fo...
☗ Hotel / Hospitality / Accomodation