GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
E-invoice Applicability Calculator New
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Free Daily GST updates on...
twitter
8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   6,067 Results

ORDER The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition being aggrieved by communication dated 01/05/2019, issued by the Office of Superintendent, Central Goods Service Tax and Central Excise, Indore wherein the respondent no.8 by referring to letter C. No.CGST/R-III/Div- III/Misc/2018-19/19 dated 16/04/2019 has disallowed the legitimate and rightful un-availed CENVAT credit on Input services, Inputs and on Capital Goods pertaining to the time period preceding the introducti...
ORDER The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition being aggrieved by communication dated 21/11/2019, issued by the Office of Commissioner, Central Goods Service Tax and Central Excise through Additional Commissioner (Tech.) GST & Central Excise, Head Quarters Ujjain, wherein the respondent no.8 by referring to the minutes of the meeting of 7th ITGRC, held on 11/06/2019 has disallowed the legitimate and rightful un-availed CENVAT credit on Input services, Inputs and...
ORDER Heard Mr. A.K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Deuri, learned Government Advocate, Assam, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Also heard Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Taxation Department, for respondent Nos.3 and 4 2. The matter pertains to determination of the quantum of tax liability to be paid by the petitioner upon successful execution of works contract, as to whether it should be determined as per the GST regime @ 12% or under the VAT regime @5%...

ASHISH ARVIND HANSOTI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 12, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. ASHISH ARVIND HANSOTI., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questio...
☗ Construction

M/S. PORTESCAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 12, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by Portescap India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question...

M/S. LFONDS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 12, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Lfonds India Pvt. Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questio...
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned show cause notice has been issued by Superintendent, Central Goods & Service Tax, Rudrapur; although, he is not competent for the purpose. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon one Circular No. 3/3/2017-GST dated 05.07.2017, which provides that Deputy or Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax alone will be the proper officer for exercising power...

M/S. JAY JALARAM ENTERPRISES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 11, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant has submitted that they are a proprietorship concern and manufacture Pop Corn, which is sold in a sealed plastic bag bearing a registered brand name as [J.J.'s] POPCORN, under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. They submitted that their product is manufactured by using corn/maize grains. The Raw corn - grains are heated in an electric machine/oven @ 180/200 degree temperature and due to the heat so given to the grains, they turn into puffed corns/popcorns which are k...
☗ Food & Beverages

M/S. MOUNT FAB PACKAGING LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 11, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant is an LLP concern and manufacture BOPP (Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene) Laminated PP Woven Sacks which was used in packaging industries. They submitted process of their products in a Chart as below: POLYPROPYLENE /POLYMER RESINS ----EXTRUDER---- TAPES---- LOOMS--- UNLAMINATED FABRIC---EXTRUSION COATING(PP/LDPE) LAMINATED FABRIC---PRINTING/CUTTING/STITCHING - WEBBING -- JUMBO BAGS – QUALITY CONTROL--DISPATCH 2. They submitte...
☗ Plastic

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX vs. M/S. LE REVE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti-Profiteering Authority | Mar 11, 2020)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 09.09.2019, received on  12.09.2019 by this Authority has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP). under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti Profiteering on 27.03.2019 recommending a detailed investigation in respect of an application, originally examined by ...
☗ Hotel / Hospitality / Accomodation