GST Library
2 Col
3 Col

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscribe (Single-user)

Subscribe (Multi-user)

GST News | Updates

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules (Single-view)

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos
GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
About Us
Our Services
Contact Us
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

7827243905

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

  8,237 Results

RRIBADA FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 24, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. RRIBADA FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. Whether Liable to Pay GST under Normal or under Reverse Charge Mechanism on Import of Services which are not rendered in Indi...
:

Classification/Supply of Services

1. The petitioners herein seeks the invocation of the writ jurisdiction for quashing the show cause notices dated 04.03.2020 and 11.03.2020 on the ground that they have been issued without assignment of any reasons for proposing the rejection of the claim of the petitioners of refund. The petitioners also challenged the orders dated 23.03.2020 passed without availing any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners and passed without assigning any reasons. 2. The prayers sought for ...
:

Refund

:

Show Cause Notice

ARSH TRADERS vs. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER


(Gujarat High Court | Nov 24, 2021)

1. The petitioner is proprietary firm trading in all types of scraps is granted TIN No.2422601774 on 13.06.2013 under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “VAT Act”). The petitioner has been registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act with Registration w.e.f. 01.07.2017 and the certificate of the said registration dated 07.07.2018. 2. A show cause notice came to be issued for cancellation of Registration on 24.06.2019 on the ground that ...
:

Cancellation of Registration

:

Cancellation of Registration

1. The dispute in the present writ petition lies in a narrow compass and relates to the rejection of the petitioners claims for budgetary support under a “Scheme of Budgetary Support under Goods and Service Tax” regime on the ground that the claims were made for the period prior to the registration which is impermissible. 2. The writ petitioner is engaged in the manufacture and supply of pharmaceutical products at their unit situated in Sikkim. They seek to challenge four orde...
:

Registration

MADHAV COPPER LIMITED vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Nov 23, 2021)

1. This is a petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the provisional attachment order attaching the properties of Madhav Copper Limited under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act’) and under the provisions of Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘GGST Act’). 2. The brief facts are as follows: - 2.1. The petitioner no.1 is a c...
:

Discrepancies in the GST returns

ARU NANDA vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 23, 2021)

CRM-38458-2021 This is an application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for impleading applicant/complainant as party i.e. respondent No.2 in the present case. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the applicant/complainant is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.2. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. CRM-M-32440-2021 This is the first petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.21 dated 04.02.2021 un...
:

Bail Application

ACHARYA SHREE MAHASHRAMAN CHATURMAS VYVASTHA SAMIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Nov 23, 2021)

1. M/s. Acharya Shree Mahashraman Chaturmas Vyvastha Samiti, 2-3-530, D.V. COLONY, SECUNDERABAD, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500003 (36AAHTA8018M1ZE) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference ...
:

Classification/Supply of Services

By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the summons issued to it on various grounds. The primary contention of learned counsel before us is that in response to the first summon served, the petitioner had submitted that it would require two weeks to appear with all the material but without giving any breathing time, further summons were being issued. Notice of motion. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Gagandeep Singh Malhotra, Advocate accepts notice on ...
:

Summon

ROTARY CLUB OF BOMBAY QUEEN CITY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 22, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Rotary Club of Bombay Queen City, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whether the activity of the applicant i.e. collecting contributions and spending towards meeting and administrative expenditures ...
:

Classification/Supply of Services

VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1. The parties have filed these petitions impugning an arbitral award dated 15.03.2021 delivered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprised of three arbitrators (‘the Arbitral Tribunal’). 2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with the contract whereby Kone Elevator India Private Limited (hereafter ‘Kone’) had agreed to supply, install and commission elevators, and Delhi Metro Rail...
:

Input Tax Credit