GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
Classification by CTA

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8130462634

GST Case Laws

0
Citation
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,730 Results

The petitioner prays for the following reliefs: “i) to call the records from 1st respondent leading to issuance of Ext.P6 notice and to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Exhibit P6 notice issued by 1st respondent U/s.129 of the Kerala GST Act 2017; ii) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, directing 2nd respondent to conduct proper adjudication after considering the clerical mistak...
The learned Counsel Mr. Mishra and Mr. Arsiwala, appearing for the Petitioners, seek to withdraw their individual Petition with liberty to approach the Goods and Service Tax Council with their grievance of omitting to take accrued credit in its TRAN-1 under the CGST Act. This, it is submitted is on account of human error. This liberty is sought in terms of the order of this Court in O.E.N. India Ltd., v/s. Union of India reported in 2018 TIOL 2874 and 2018 TIOL 2892 ...

JITENDRA'S AUTO WORLD vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Jun 14, 2019)

Mr. Rastogi, learned Counsel in support of the Petition, seeks leave to amend the Petition so as to annex the first page and other relevant pages of the minutes of the meeting held on 22nd December, 2018 of Goods and Service Tax Council (GST Council). Leave as prayed for granted. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Amended copy to be served upon the Respondent immediately thereafter. 2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge...

VIDARBHA INFOTECH PVT LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 13, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by VIDARBHA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. Whether...

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND RESEARC..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Jun 13, 2019)

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Berhampur (Appellant) has filed an appeal before AAAR, Odisha on 18.03.2019 aggrieved by advance ruling no 07/ODISHA-AAR/2018-19 dated 05.02.2019 pronounced by the Odisha Authority for Advance Ruling, Bhubaneswar under Section 100 of the Odisha Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 /CGST Act, 2017. 2.0. The Appellant, holding valid registration certificate issued under the CGST Act, 2017 and OGST Act, 2017 bearing GSTIN 21AABA10...
☗ Services (education)
Mr.M.A. Mudi Mannan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned senior panel counsel (GST), who had accepted notice on behalf of both the respondents (official respondents), are before this Court. 2. With the consent of learned counsel on both sides, the main writ petition itself is taken up, heard out and disposed of. 3.Today, in a similar matter with identical set of facts (obviously nature of business and numerical values being different), this Co...
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has challenged the proceedings dated 06.03.2019 of the respondent No.2 in MOV-07 inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to refund the penalty of ₹ 1,71,360/-. 3. The petitioner is the dealer and supplier of essential oils, perfumery compounds and aromatic chemicals having establishments at Kundapura Taluk, Udupi District and also at Mumbai in the State of Maharashtra, as contended...
Mr.Muthuvenkataraman, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned senior panel counsel (GST), who had accepted notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 yesterday, is before this Court. 2. To be noted, the third respondent is Indian Overseas Bank and considering the nature of the matter, the third respondent is only in the nature of a Garnishee. Therefore, it will suffice if the order (which this Court shall now be passing in this writ ...
Heard Sri P.S. Soman Pulladan, the petitioner's counsel and Smt. M.M. Jasmin, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The petitioner challenges Ext.P5 order made under Section 129 of KSGST Act. Ext.P5 is an appealable order. The petitioner by furnishing Bank Guarantee has obtained release of goods intercepted and detained by the authorities under Section 129. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence to file appeal and work out the remedies within the four...

COPMED PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority / Commissioner (Appeals), Chandigarh | Jun 13, 2019)

M/s. Copmed Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Area, Gondpur, Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellants’) are manufacturing Pharmaceutical products falling under HSN Code 3004. The Appellant has filed four appeals against four Refund Sanction Orders (RFD-06) (for brevity ‘the impugned orders’) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Goods & Services Tax Division, Parwanoo (for brevity ‘the sanctioning authority’) rejectin...
☗ Pharma