GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Case Laws Sitemap
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
E-invoice Applicability Calculator New
Inverted Duty Refund Calculator New
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

About Us

Our Services

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   6,287 Results

1) Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2) This intra-court appeal is directed against an order dated 22.08.2022 passed in WPA No.18134 of 2022. The writ petition is still pending before the learned Single Bench and the direction to file affidavits has been issued. The appellant is aggrieved by non-granting of any interim order pending disposal of the writ petition. 3) The controversy involved in the writ petition lies in a very narrow campus. Therefore, with the consent of the ...
★ Cancellation of Registration
COMMON ORDER The parties and the issue involved in all these writ petitions are one and the same and therefore, they are heard together and disposed of this by this common order. 2.The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in the supply of bulk materials transporting/handling systems. The petitioner provides solutions for bulk materials transportation, like coal, limestone, cement, potash, flyash and sinter, using overland belt conveyor...

FIROZ RAHIMBHAI PARIYANI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 1, 2022)

ORDER 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Virat G. Popat with learned advocate Ms. Shweta Lodha for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L. B. Dabhi on behalf of the respondent-State, learned Advocate Mr. Salim Saiyed for the first informant. 2. Rule. Learned APP Mr. Dabhi waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State. 3. By way of this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant prays for being released on antici...

PANCHAM PLASTO CHEM vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 1, 2022)

Heard learned advocate Ms. Amrita Thakore for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya, who appears for respondent No.1 pursuant to notice issued by this court on 7.7.2022. 2. The petitioner is a small scale unit carrying on business of manufacturing of Master Batch colouring material for different kinds of plastic. It sells the same to the local manufacturers. The products of the petitioner are intermediate goods to be utilised for manufacturing of pl...

MANINDER SHARMA AND OTHERS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Aug 31, 2022)

This order shall dispose of four bail petitions filed under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of regular bail in Complaint No.15 of 2021 titled as State Versus Vinod Kumar & Ors. Registered on 12.05.2021 under Sections 132(1) (a), (b) & (c) of Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Punjab Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 by Maninder Sharma bearing CRM-M-24033-2021, Vinod Kumar bearing CRM-M-329022021, Sunny Mehta bearing CRM-M-32903-3021 & Sandeep Singh bearing CRM-M-36121-202...
★ Bail Application
ORDER The issue involved in the present petition is that due to technical glitches, the petitioner was unable to file TRAN-1 during the time when the portal was open. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the final order rendered on 22.07.2022 in the case of Union of India and another vs. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd & Another, whereby the apex Court in an attempt to resolve the piquant situation prevailing around the nation where assessees were deprived...
ORDER Mr.V.Prasanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent and is armed with instructions to enable a final disposal of the matter. Hence, by consent expressed by both learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, this matter is taken up finally even at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner has challenged Form GST MOV-01 dated 21.08.2022, that has been issued after inspection of vehicle bearing No.TN 24 W 6373 on 21.08.20...

YUSUF vs. STAT TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Aug 30, 2022)

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent GST authority, under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act and WBGST Act, 2017 dated 10th August, 2022. Mr. Ghosh learned advocate appearing for the respondent State GST authority was directed by the order dated 26th August, 2022 to take appropriate instruction in the matter and in compliance of the same he has filed written instruction dated 29th ...
The issue involved in the present petition is that due to technical glitches, the petitioner was unable to file TRAN-1 during the time when the portal was open. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the final order rendered on 22.07.2022 in the case of Union of India and another vs. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd & Another, whereby the apex Court in an attempt to resolve the piquant situation prevailing around the nation where assessees were deprived due to technic...

VARUN GUPTA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 29, 2022)

1. Heard Sri Alok Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent no.2. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief : “1. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing order dated 19.05.2022 passed by the respondent no.02 i.e. the Commissioner of Central Goo...
★ Attachment of Bank Accounts/Property