Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
GST Calender
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
GST Case Laws / Advance Rulings ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,642 cases mapped to 13,323 taggings
Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   3,642 Results

M/S. SAI STEEL CO. & CONSULTANTS


(AAR | Himachal Pradesh)

1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Sai Steel Co & Consultants, Hamirpur, H.P regarding applicability of GST on “Mukhyamantri Khet Sanrakshan Yojna”. 2. On scrutiny of the application, it was observed that the requisite fee has not been deposited by the applicant. The direction to this effect was issued on dated 21st October, 2020. It was further decided that...

Dec 18, 2020  

Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 24.1.2019 passed by the respondent no. 3, whereby a tax demand of ₹ 91,450/- and interest thereon has been passed as per GST DRC-07 as well as the order dated 27.7.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the GST Act, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on the grounds of limitation. The petitioner claims to b...

Dec 17, 2020  

1. Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K.S. Raghuvansi, counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order passed by the Additional Commissioner GST, Gautam Buddh Nagar being the order dated 27.1.2020 as well as the Appellate Order dated 15.1.2020, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. As the Tribunal as provided for under the GST Act has not been constituted and in absen...

Dec 17, 2020  

By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, which is a sole proprietorship firm, has challenged fundamentally two orders being the order dated 15.11.2018 [Annnexure-4 to the writ petition] and the decision contained in the communication dated 17.12.2019 [Annexure-6 to the writ petition]. In addition, it has been urged by the petitioner that the defects/errors manifest in the showcause notice dated 10.10.2018 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition]...

Dec 17, 2020  

INDER PARTAP SINGH vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

The petitioner being the sole proprietor of M/s Shri Balaji Wooltex is sought to be prosecuted by the State under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 259 and 120-B IPC on account of his firm having wrongly adjudged input tax credit resulting in loss of tax to the Government exchequer to the extent of ₹ 2.24 crores (approximately). After his arrest in the afore-referred matter, the petitioner filed an application before the Trial Court seeking regular bail which was allowed by the Trial Co...

Dec 17, 2020  

The present petition has been filed alleging that on 30th August, 2018, the respondent no. 2 passed a detention order under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act. It is stated that on 4.2.2019, respondents had issued a demand notice to the petitioner directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of ₹ 21,10,032/-. The petitioner claims that it is on this date that the petitioner became aware of the said demand and met the respondent requesting him to withdraw the demand notice as no demand exists a...

Dec 16, 2020  

1. This application has been preferred under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in connection with CBIC-DIN-202008DWW400004H92FF dated 06.08.2020, Summons under Section 70 of CGST Act 2017: CBIC-DIN-202008DWW400008T5815, dated 24.08.2020 for offence under Sections 67(2) of CGST Act, 2017 and GGST Act, 2017. 2. Heard Mr.Kartikkumar K. Joshi, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned APP for the respondent State. Considering the ...

Dec 16, 2020  

This Review Petition has been filed by the State seeking to review the judgment dated 02.11.2020 in W.P(C).No.23397 of 2020. By the said judgment, which considered the legality of the detention of a consignment of goods at Muthanga, Wynad, during the course of interstate transportation, this Court had, taking note of the fact that the consignment was not covered by a valid delivery chalan that was one of the prescribed documents for transportation of exempted goods, found that the detention w...

Dec 16, 2020  

Hon'ble Samit Gopal, J. Heard Sri Durgesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned brief holder for the State. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Prathu Omar with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and direct ...

Dec 16, 2020  

1. By this writ-application under Article226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:- (a) That this Honorable Court be pleased to quash and set aside Notification no.26/2017Custom, dated 29.06.2017 annexed as 'Annexure G' to the extent amending Notification no.16/2015Customs, dated 01.04.2015, annexed as 'Annexure – B'; and (b) That this Honorable Court be pleased to quash and set aside Trade Notice 11/2018, dated ...

Dec 16, 2020