GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
Classification by CTA

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8130462634

GST Case Laws

0
Citation
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,620 Results

1. By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order Annexure P-9 whereby respondent has only for name sake modified its order dated 16.7.2021 as per the judgment of this Court but in reality continued attachment of Cash Credit Limit Bank Account No. 02102790000782 in HDFC Bank, Yamuna Nagar. 2. The Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 passed an order provisionally attaching bank account of the petitioner on 16.7.2021 under Rule 159 (1) of the GST Rules. The pe...

MAHAVIR ENTERPRISE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 2, 2021)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) to quash and to set aside the action under section 83 taken by the respondent no.4; (b) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the Respondents (i) To lift the attachment of property; (ii) Not to take any coercive action against the petitioner. (c) To issue order(s), d...
★ Attachment of Bank Accounts/Property
Heard Dr. A Saraf, learned senior counsel for the petitioner in WP(C)No.3878/2021 & WP(C)No.3880/2021. Also heard Mr. SC Keyal, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C)No.3675/2021 and WP(C)4120/2021. 2. It is taken note of that the petitioners in WP(C)No.3675/2021 and WP(C)No.4120/2021 i.e., the authorities under the GST Department are the respondents in WP(C)No.3878/2021 and WP(C)No.3880/2021, whereas the assessee BMG Informatics Pvt. Ltd., is the respondent in WP(C)No.3675/2021...

SYMMETRIC INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Sep 2, 2021)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGSTRGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a referen...
1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has challenged the retrospective amendment dated 18.05.2020 by which the provision of Section 128 of the Finance Act, 2020 has been inserted with effect from 1s t July, 2017 to Section 140 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by prescribing a time limit for taking the input tax credit. The petitioner has also sought the benefit of transitional credit of ₹ 6,04,47,033/-. 2. By a detailed judgment dated 5th May, 2020 in WP(C) No.196/...
This appeal has been filed by the appellant/writ petitioner, challenging the order passed in W.P.No.15708 of 2021, dated 29.07.2021. 2.The appellant is the Managing Director of a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, which is engaged in the business of transportation. The appellant sought for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to quash the summons issued by the respondent dated 08.07.2021, under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referre...
Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in previous listing on 24.08.2021 which reads as follows: 'Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel for writ petitioner is before this Virtual Court. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for writ petitioner that an order cancelling the registration of the writ petitioner being 'order dated 14.10.2019 bearing reference ZA3310190446931' (hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity) has been c...
★ Revocation of Cancellation of Registration
★ Opportunity of being heard
Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in previous listing on 23.08.2021 which reads as follows: 'Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel for writ petitioner in all captioned writ petitions is before this Virtual Court. 2. The short point in these writ petitions turns on obtaining position that unbranded rice is an exempted commodity, but branded rice is taxable. 3. Writ petitioner-Assessee which has sold rice in gunny bags has not filed annexure al...
The petitioner has challenged an order dated 23.04.2021 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Charge-IV, Tripura cancelling the petitioner’s registration under Tripura Goods and Services Tax Act as well as Central Goods and Services Tax Act. 2. Brief facts are as under: The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of providing goods on rental basis to its customers across the country including in the State of Tripura. In the Stat...
The petitioner has challenged 5 summary demand orders produced at Annexure-P/22 collectively passed by the Superintendent of Taxes on 23.04.2021 (which are based on a common assessment order dated 23.4.2021) raising demands of Central as well as GST and IGST from the petitioner with penalty for the tax periods 2017-18 to 2020-21. 2. Brief facts are as under: Petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of providing goods on rental basis to ...