GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,297 Results

JUDGMENT J. NISHA BANU, J. The appellant has approached this Court under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, read with Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated 07.08.2024 passed in Appeal No.18 of 2024, confirming the judgment passed by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Chennai dated 26.04.2023 in C.C.P.No.233 of 2021. 2. The essential facts of the ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAGWAN DAS AGRAHARI vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 1.5.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 and the order dated 14.3.2023 passed by respondent no. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a very short controversy is involved in the present petition. He submits that proceedings under Section ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAWARLAL AGARWAL vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the order dated 19.12.2024, Annexure-1 to the writ petition, passed under Section 129(3) of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017 ('the Act'). 2. Submission has been made that goods being transported, were detained under the provisions of Section 129 of the Act, the notice dated 5.12.2024 and Form GST MOV-7 was issued in the name of the driver. The petitioner claimed ownership of the goods and made a representation on 11....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. Petitioner is a transport contractor, who is a registered owner of two Tanker Lorries bearing Registration Nos.KA-11C-2468 and KA-41B- 6559. The vehicle bearing Registration No. KA-11C-2468 was intercepted at Koyilandy at 2.00 a.m. on 31.12.2024 while vehicle bearing Registration No. KA-41B-6559 was intercepted on 30.12.2024 at 4.35 p.m. at Payyannur. The vehicles were found transporting kerosine without any documents and hence the vehicles were detain...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner is a company against whom a show cause notice was issued on 24.07.2024 under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The said show cause notice is a composite notice for the years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23. Pursuant to the said show cause notice, which is produced as Exhibit-P1, a reply notice dated 03.09.2024 was filed by the petitioner, wherein an opportunity of hearing and cross-examination was sought for. Petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MONI KANTA DAS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER Heard Mr. S.K. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. B.N. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, CGS for all the respondents. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he carries out the business of works contracts under the trade name, ‘Sri Moni Kanta Das’ and from its principal place of business at Duliajan, Dibrugarh, Assam. For the purpose of carrying out its business, the petitioner got itself registered under the Goods and Services Tax [GST] Act, 2017 wi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. 1. Heard Mr. N. Venkataraman, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Revenue and Ms. Anuradha Dutt, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Delay condoned. 3. The High Court while allowing the Writ Petitions filed by the respondents, quashed the show cause notices issued by the Revenue seeking recovery of Rs.3731 Crore holding as under in Paras 32 and 33 respectively:- “32....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINEET JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. DGGI/INV/GST/3844/2023-Gr D-O/o ADG-DGGI-JZU-JAIPUR for the offence(s) under Section 132 (1) (C), (f) & (H), Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2017’). 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was arrested on 28.09.202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PER M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, C.J. 1) In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing order dt. 28.02.2022 (Annexure-3) passed by the Joint Commissioner confirming the order dt. 15.12.2020 passed by the 2nd Respondent. 2) Petitioner is registered under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as an assessee. 3) For the financial year 2018-19, the 2nd Respondent passed an order dt. 15.12.2020 (Annexure-1) that the petitioner has availed excess amount of Input Tax Credit in GS...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

WIPRO LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Karnataka High Court | Jan 23, 2025)

ORAL ORDER Sri. Venkatesh S.Arbatti., counsel for the petitioner and Smt. K.S. Anusuyadevi., CGSC for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The short facts are these: The petitioner - WIPRO Limited Bangalore is engaged in the manufacture and export of Information Technology products. For the purpose of its exports and imports, the petitioner has been issued Import Export Code IEC No.0488006040 in terms of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


12
Feb
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
13 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Jan 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Jan 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Feb

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Jan 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).