Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Case Laws ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,293 cases mapped to 12,110 taggings
Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   3,293 Results

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 72 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 04.06.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaints of the Applicant Nos. 1 to 71 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit (ITC) in respect of the flats purchased by them in the project &ld...

Aug 27, 2020  

Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “I. To the respondent no. 4 to permit the Petitioner to file/upload statutory appeal on the GST web portal under section 107 of the GST Act, 2017 (as contained in Annexure-4) without adjusting the amount of pre- requisite 10% (₹ 71,842/-) amount of the assessed/disputed amount of tax against the demand (as contained in Annexure- 4/1) for filing of appeal against Assessment order dated 30.05.2019/30.8.2019 passed under section 62 of ...

Aug 27, 2020  

CRL.M.A. 11494/2020 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1692/2020 2. The petitioner (Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Indore Regional Unit) has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.08.2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Bail Application No.1576/2020, whereby the respondent was granted anticipatory bail. 3. Mr Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been forum hunting. H...

Aug 27, 2020  

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 29.10.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of the Villa No. B-02 purchased by him in the Respondent...

Aug 27, 2020  

1. Heard Mr. Hardik Modh, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dharmesh Devnani, learned AGP on advance copy for respondent State. 2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has mainly prayed as under: “11(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ or Mandamus, or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Order or direction for calling upon the refund application dated 24.12.2019&nb...

Aug 26, 2020  

The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent No.4 – Assistant Director, DGGSTI, Indore and respondent No.5 – Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGSTI, Indore to release the cash amounting to ₹ 66,43,130/- seized from the petitioner vide Panchnama dated 30/05/2020 from the residential premises of the petitioner and her husband. 02-The petitioner is the wife of Shri Sanjay Matta. Sh...

Aug 26, 2020  

M/S. LIBERTY TRANSLINES


(AAAR | Maharashtra)

(Proceeding under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has b...

Aug 26, 2020  

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 24.04.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit in respect of the flat purchased by him in the “River View Heights&rd...

Aug 25, 2020  

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P6 penalty order passed under Section 130 of the GST Act. During the pendency of the Writ petition the petitioner preferred Ext.P11 appeal before the 3rd respondent against Ext.P6 penalty order. The limited prayer now is for a direction to the 3 rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P11 appeal expeditiously, and to keep in abeyance recovery steps for the balance amounts recoverable from the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P6 penal...

Aug 25, 2020  

M/S. TATA MOTORS LIMITED


(AAR | Maharashtra)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively J by M/s. Tata Motors Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. W...

Aug 25, 2020