GST Library
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
Classification by CTA

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
Free GST updates via...

GST Case Laws

High Court
Search by Related Tags


Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,730 Results


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 1, 2021)

Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Apurva Hajela, learned counsel for the Revenue and Sri Anant Tiwari, learned counsel for the Union of India. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 28.2.2018 passed under Section 129(3) of UPGST Rules, 2017. Solitary submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the goods have been seized solely on account of absence of E-way bill prescribed under the UPGST Rules, 2017. Relying on earlier dec...
1. Heard Ms. Anjali Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the revenue and Sri Namit Srivastava, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Manish Trivedi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Bank. 2. Present writ petition has been filed to assail the action taken by the respondents-revenue authorities whereby they had restrained the petitioner from utilising its money lying in its bank account bearing No. 414505000364 with the ICICI Bank Ltd., Advant ...
CM APPL. 34374/2021 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11165/2021n & CM APPL. 34373/2021 Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13th September, 2021 passed by the Commissioner, CGST & CX, Delhi East whereby the bank accounts (No. 072105000934 maintained at ICICI Bank Ltd, New Delhi, No. 50200007530441 maintained at HDFC Bank Ltd, New Delhi and No.916020029282287 maintained at ...


(Patna High Court | Sep 30, 2021)

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “1(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or directions(s) in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order cum demand notice dated 11.01.2021 (Annexure- 3) passed by the respondent Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under Section 74 of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as ‘the BGST Act, 2017 only) read with Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein after re...
The petitioner has sought for issuance of appropriate writ to declare the collection of tax, penalty and cess by the respondent to be in violation of the provisions of CGST Act, 2017, KGST Act, 2017 and Circular No.41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018. Further relief is sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash GST DRC-07 dated 15.07.2020 and for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to refund the tax, penalty and cess amounting to ₹ 18,13,254/- collected from the petiti...
Heard Shri Niraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Apurva Hajela, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition has been filed to quash the adjudication order dated 29.05.2021 passed by the respondent no. 2 under Section 74 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017, whereby, adjudication has been made with respect to the show cause notice dated 17.08.2019 for the tax period July, 2017. Further, challenge has been made to two other show cause notices dated 09.04.2021...


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Sep 28, 2021)

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C.') for grant of regular bail in Complaint Case No.IV(6) DGGI/RRU/INV/22/2018-19 filed under Section 132(1) (b) and (c) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'the CGST Act'). Briefly stated, the allegations against the petitioner, relevant for disposal of the present petition are that M/s Nikita Industries Pvt. Ltd., Sonepat is a...


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 28, 2021)

Note for speaking to minutes is filed urging that as there were similar three matters on the particular day, the order of Special Civil Application No.14273 of 2021 has been transcribed in the present matter. The entire order shall be replaced by recalling the order dated 23.09.2021 and the new order shall be as under: “1. The petitioner is a proprietary firm duly registered and is holding the GSTIN No.24AOXPP6994H1ZX. He deals in wholesale/retain purchase and sale of unwrought alum...
This Writ Petition is filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent - Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Bhavan, Secunderabad,, to grant the IGST refund of ₹ 14,78,99,959/- along with applicable rate of interest under Section 56 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the CGST Act’), for the period - February, 2021 to May, 2021; directing the 4th respondent - Joint Commissioner of Customs, O/o the Principal Commissioner of Custom...
This Writ Petition is filed primarily assailing the Order-in- Appeal No.HYD-GST-RRC-APP-091-20-21 (APP I), dt.29.12.2020, passed by the 4th respondent, whereby the said respondent had set aside the order passed by the 5th respondent in Appeal No.03/2020-RR(GST)JC-D-D, dt.24.06.2020, denying the refund of excess amount lying to the credit of electronic cash ledger of the petitioner maintained under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the CGST Act’). 2. The...