GST Library
Login | Register
Subscription
GST News
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
GST Videos
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale New

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   5,705 Results

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records perta...

R.K. MODI AND SONS AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Apr 20, 2022)

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITP) of Rs.39,93,286/- from DRC-03 dated 28.01.2020 (Annexure-P/1) followed by demand notice dated 18.06.2021 passed by respondents No.2 & 3. 02. The facts of the case in short are as under: - 2.1. The petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing wholesale beedi. The petitioner had declared the ITC ...
The prayer sought for in this writ petition is for a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent proceedings in Reference Number : ZA330122269496K, dated 27.01.2022 and the consequential revocation cancellation order in Reference Number : ZA330322018595T, dated 04.03.2022 and quash the same. 2. The petitioner is a dealer under the GST regime. For the alleged non-filing of the return, the registration of the petitioner under GST has been cancelled by the proceedings of th...
1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2. Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Diary No.27099 of 2020 is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.07.2019 passed by the High Court1 in Special Civil Application No.18591 of 2018 and against the order dated 13.03.2020 passed in Review Petition arising therefrom being Misc. Civil Application No.1 of 2019. (For facility, hereinafter referred to as, “the first case”) Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Dia...
1. The record shows that the above-captioned writ petition was dismissed in default on account of non-prosecution, on 09.03.2022. 1.1 However, upon an application being moved by the petitioner i.e., CM 15702/2022, the order dated 09.03.2022 was recalled via order dated 30.03.2022, and the writ petition was restored to its original number and position. 2. Mr R. Ramachandran, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondents, says that the impugned order dated 06...
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to accept the bank guarantee equivalent to the disputed penalty amount of ₹ 25,86,662/- in accordance with the provisions of Section 129(1)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017 and provisionally release the goods along with the conveyance bearing TN 07 AV 7881, pass such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2. The case of the pet...
2. Since both these writ applications are interconnected and common issue is involved, as such both are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. 3. Writ Petition No. 3908 of 2020 pertains to the Financial Year 2017-18 wherein the petitioner prayed for quashing and setting aside “summary of the order” as contained in Form-GST DRC 07 dated 11.09.2020 issued by respondent no.4 whereby the petitioner was directed to make payment of tax, interest and penalty. S...

MAHALAKSHMI INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 18, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. MAHALAKSHMI INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. If the tax rate of M/s. Mahalaxmi B T Patil Honai Constructions IV (Referred to as JV) is NIL as per SI No 3A- Chapter N...

B.T. PATIL & SONS BELGAUM CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIM..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 18, 2022)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. B.T. PATIL & SONS BELGAUM CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions: A) If the tax rate of M/s. Mahalaxmi B T Patil Honai Constructions JV (Referred to as JV) is NIL as per SI...

TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Apr 18, 2022)

The applicant M/s. Tirupati Construction, have been awarded a works contract for Construction of New Adarsh Nivashi Shala (Kumar) / School Hostel (324 Bed) / Staff Quarters and Kumar Chhatralay (300 Bed) at Village : Baben, Taluka : Bardoli, District : Surat, by the Road and Building Department in the Government of Gujarat vide Work Order Number : AB/TC/B-2/3/1181 dated : 01.06.2020. The said construction contract is labour plus material. The “Construction of said New Adarsh Nivashi Sha...