GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Videos
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification by CTA
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

GST e-Books
GST Act & Rules
GST Rates Compendium
HSN Guide 2022

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.
TM
Free GST updates via...
twitter
8130462634

GST Case Laws

0
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   4,862 Results

At the behest of the Court, the parties have agreed in principle to the form of the order, but have left the modalities to be worked out by the Court. 2. The appellants accept the figures indicated in the letter dated December 3, 2021 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Shillong, Division – II to the Assistant Commissioner (LAW), CGST, Shillong Commissionerate. However, the appellants submit that the figures indicated are subject to adjustment upon the conclusion of the appe...
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a mandamus to direct the respondents herein to permit he petitioner to apply for revocation of cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner. 2. It is the case of the petitioner, that the petitioner had obtained GST Registration after GST was implemented with effect from 01.07.2017. However, the petitioner was unable to comply with the requirements of the Act and the rules made thereunder and therefore a notice under Section 30 of the T...
The case of the writ petitioner-assessee is that a mistake was made while submitting a declaration electronically in form GST TRAN-1 under Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. 2. According to the petitioner, in course of the transition from the previous central excise regime to the GST regime, the petitioner, like other assesses, may not have been experienced and the mistake inadvertently crept in: the credit that ought to have been claimed had not been claimed. In ...
1. The petitioner by presenting this writ petition dated August 27, 2021 seeks the following relief: - “a) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ/direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order thereby directing the Respondent No. 2 to unblock the input tax credit of INR 1.17 Cr availed by the petitioner in its electronic credit ledger; b) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to Issue a writ of mandamus or a...
Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order of the respondents dated 13.10.2021 detaining the goods carrier vehicle bearing Registration No.TN-22-BZ-3435 in which goods were being loaded belonging to the petitioner as it did not accompany a proper invoice or E-way bill. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that after the seizure of the goods vehicle, a notice under Section 129(...
1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the action on the part of the respondent no.5 in refusing to accept and entertain the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the impugned assessment order dated April 20, 2019 passed under Section 62 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter “the said Act” for short). Initially the appeal was tried to be filed manually by the petitioner on N...
1. This petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, where this Court while issuing Notice on 25.11.2021, has passed following order: “1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking following reliefs: “8. In the above premises, the petitioner most respectfully prays as under: (A) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the Respondents t...
Heard Mr. G. Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Santhi Chandra, learned Junior Standing Counsel, CBIC, for respondents no.1 to 4 and Mr. Harinath N., learned Assistant Solicitor General for respondent no.5. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 25.06.2021 passed by respondent no.4 by which the application for consideration under Section 80 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”) read with Rule 158 of...
1. The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved of the inaction on the part of the respondents in permitting the petitioner to submit the TRAN-1 Form under GST Act claiming for the input tax credit. 2. The brief facts relevant for the disposal of the present writ petition is that petitioner is a Trader registered under the G.S.T. Act dealing in two and three wheeler spare parts holding GSTIN-22ABHPN8512G1ZU. By way of the introduction of the new GST regime w.e.f. 01.07.2017, the...

ANMOL BINDAL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 1, 2021)

1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Anmol Bindal, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with summons/notice dated 02.09.2021 issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Dehradun Regional Unit, 3rd Floor,...