GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Subscription
GST News
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale New

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Free Daily GST updates on...
twitter
8882663036

GST Case Laws

Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   5,858 Results

GURUNANAK ROMELL LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 8, 2022)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Gurunanak Romell LLP, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. a. Whether Entry No. ...
1. Rule. Mr.Trupesh Kathiriya, learned AGP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today. 3. By way of the present petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed as under: “8(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropri...
Re : I.A. No.CAN 2 of 2022 1. This is an application praying for condonation of delay of 37 days in preferring the instant appeal. 2. Having heard Mr. Kanodia, learned advocate appearing for the applicant/appellant and Mr. Ghosh, learned Government advocate appearing for the respondents, we are of the considered view that sufficient cause has been shown for belated presentation of the appeal. 3. Accordingly the application is allowed. Re : M.A.T. 714 of 2022 4. This intra-...

ADI ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 8, 2022)

1. Rule. Mr. Priyank P. Lodha, learned Central Government Standing Counsel waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. By way of the present application, the applicants - original petitioners have prayed to direct the respondents to grant refund of the amount of IGST already paid by the applicants pursuant to the Entry No.10 of Notification No.10/2017-IGST (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 with appropriate interest on such refund. 3. Mr. Uchit N. Sheth, learned advocate appearing for...

KAPIL HUKMICHAND KOTHARI vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 7, 2022)

1.Draft amendment is allowed. To be carried out forthwith. 2.Rule. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4. 3.With the consent of the learned advocates for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal. 4.By way of present petition under Articles 226 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed as under: “a) to quash and set aside the Order of Dete...

THE SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jun 7, 2022)

1. M/s. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Head Office, Kothagudem Collieries, Kothagudem, Badradri, Telangana, 5071014 (36AAACT8873F1Z1) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference...

THE SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jun 7, 2022)

1. M/s. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Head Office, Kothagudem Collieries, Kothagudem, Badradri, Telangana, 5071014 (36AAACT8873F1Z1) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference...
This intra court appeal by the appellant is directed against an order dated 07.04.2022 passed in WPA 6146 of 2022 filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 31.03.2022 passed under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with relevant provisions of West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2022, Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Goods and Services Compensation to States Tax Act, 2017. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by d...
This intra court appeal by the writ petitioners is directed against an order dated 21.03.2022 passed in WPA 4360 of 2022. The appellants are before us on the ground that the interim order sought for in the writ petition was not granted. The order which has been impugned in the writ petition is an order passed by the respondent authority blocking the electronic credit ledger account of the appellant dealer. The learned Single Judge was of the view that the appellant has not made out a prim...

VADILAL ENTERPRISES LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jun 7, 2022)

M/s. Vadilal Enterprises Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Vadilal for the sake of brevity) submitted that it supplies ice-cream in various States in addition to the supplies in Gujarat State. For transporting the goods to places located in different States, Vadilal has been availing facility of refrigerated vehicles because the goods have to be stored and preserved at a particular temperature for avoiding deterioration in quality, for which such refrigerated vehicles are an essentiality. Vari...