TM
TaxReply India Private Limited
8130462634
Taxreply tweets 
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Rates Reckoner
Classification of Goods and Services
Classification of Goods and Services (Search)
Free Trial
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules - Latest Amendments
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Notifications / Circulars Press Releases +
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Case Laws (All)
✓
↳ AAR Orders
↳ AAAR Orders
↳ NAA Orders
✓
↳ High Court Orders
↳ Supreme Court Orders
GST Forms
E-way Bill
↳ E-way Notifications
↳ E-way Bill News
↳ E-way Bill Rules
↳ E-way Bill FAQ
Finance Bill
148 Result
NAA | Jul 23, 2020 | 42/2020
1. The present Report dated 18.12.2019 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of “D
NAA | Jul 16, 2020 | 41/2020
1. The present Report dated 31.12.2019 has been furnished by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 01.07.2019 recommending a detailed investigation in respect of an application, originally examined by the Rajasthan State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2)
NAA | Jul 14, 2020 | 40/2020
NAA | Jul 10, 2020 | 39/2020
1. The Present Report dated 10.12.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Asti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 in which it has been stated that an application dated 12.08.2018 was filed before the Rajasthan State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a fla
NAA | Jul 7, 2020 | 37/2020
1. The present Report dated 30.10.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director-General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line With Rue 129 (6) of the central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No, 1 had filed an application dated 28.01.2019 under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of “Services by way of admis
NAA | Jul 7, 2020 | 38/2019
1. The investigation Report dated 23.102018 was received from the Applicant No. 2, the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case were that the Uttar Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering had forwarded an application filed by the Applicant No, 1 to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, as per the minutes of its meeting h
NAA | Jul 6, 2020 | 36/2020
NAA | Jun 26, 2020 | 35/2020
1. The present Report dated 27.12.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide her application dated 03.08.2018 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purch
NAA | Jun 26, 2020 | 34/2020
1 The present Report dated 23.12.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the product “Frozen Green Peas” supplied by him. The Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had not r
NAA | Jun 25, 2020 | 33/2020
1. The present Report dated 28.10.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 3 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide their application dated 25.03.2019 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 and the Applicant No. 2 had alleged profiteering by the