Payment Failure - GST Library by TaxReply.com
Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Have a Query?      Other Services     
🔒 Login    

Tax Audit due date extension AY 2019-20

    

GST Council 37th Meeting Update

    

Corporate tax rates slashed to 22% for domestic companies and 15% for new domestic manufacturing companies and other fiscal reliefs

    

Fake Input and refund of IGST on exports - crackdown by DGGI and DRI

    

GST Council may Scrap GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C for FY 17-18 for small taxpayers upto 5 crore turnover

    

Changes in 36th GST Council Meeting held on 27th July 2019

    

CMP-08 due date for quarter April 2019 to June 2019 extended till 31st July 2019

    

Press Release restricting the last date for availing ITC for FY 2017-18 is illegal : Gujarat High Court

    

Budget 2019 Highlights - 05 July 2019

    

Transfer of GST amount from one head to other head (Form GST PMT - 09)

    

DGGST arrests one person for availing and passing fake ITC of Rs.16 Crore.

    

Notification issued to extend the date of blocking and unblocking on e-way bill facility to 21.08.2019.

    

Press Release of 35th GST Council Meeting held on 21st June 2019

    

Issues reported in filing Form GSTR 9C by the taxpayers : Advisory by Team GSTN

    

Issues reported in filing Form GSTR 9 by the taxpayers: Advisory by Team GSTN

    

New GST Return Transition Phase applicable from Oct 2019

    

Latest amendments in GST enacted on 07.03.2019

    

Recommendations of the 33rd GST Council meeting held on 24.02.2019

    

GSTR-3B due date for January 2019 has been extended upto 22.02.2019

    

New GST Input-Output Set off Rules w.e.f. 01.02.2019

     View all
View all
Home       Login    Pay

GST Case Laws
TaxReply.com - Free Tax updates for All
GST Library TM
About GST Library
GST Library Pricing
Free Trial
Full Site Search
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules - Latest Amendments
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Notifications / Circulars Press Releases +
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Case Laws
↳ GST AAR Orders
↳ GST AAAR Orders
↳ GST NAA Orders
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
↳ E-way Bill Notificaitons
↳ E-way Bill News
↳ E-way Bill Rules
↳ E-way Bill FAQ
GST Rates for goods and services
GST Set-off Calculator
GST News / Articles
Finance Bill
Advance Search Tool
TR Citation -TR-
Court
State
Classification of Goods / Services
Related Section / Rule / Notification / HSN / SAC   OR     OR  
In Favour of   
Date (From)
Date (To)
Petitioner / Applicant / Respondent's Name
Free-Text Search
Sort By

Text Search option  


GST Case Laws

Found: 83 Result  

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. HORIZON PROJECTS PVT. LTD [2019 (11) TR 7]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 15-11-2019 | | Order No.56/2019

1. This Report dated 10.12.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 31.05.2018 filed before the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017 the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent, i

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. GYAN BOOKS PVT LTD [2019 (11) TR 6]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 06-11-2019 | | Order No.54/2019

1. The present Report dated 11.06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of its meeting held on 11.03.2019 had forwarded an application dated 28.02.2019 filed by the Applicant No. 1, to the DGAP. The Applicant No. 1 had st

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS vs. MAN REALTY LTD. [2019 (11) TR 4]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 05-11-2019 | | Order No.53/2019

1. The present Report dated 03.04.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 18.07.2018 filed before the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respond

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. OCEAN SEVEN BUILDTECH PVT. LTD [2019 (11) TR 5]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 05-11-2019 | | Order No.55/2019

1. This Report dated 21.02.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 5 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 20.06.2018 had referred 03 applications filed by the Applicant No. 1, 2 & 3, to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 12

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TAXES, AND CUSTOMS VERSUS vs. GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. [2019 (10) TR 18]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 21-10-2019 | | Order No.50/2019

1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, an Application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent alleging that in the bill raised for “Sanitary Napkin” (hereinafter referred to as the product) after exemption of GST from 12% to Nil w.e.f. 27.07.2018 on the above product, vide Notification No. 19/2

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS vs. SHREE INFRA [2019 (10) TR 19]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 21-10-2019 | | Order No.51/2019

1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent before the Gujarat State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering. The above Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit by way of commensurate reduction in price in respect of purchase of two flats bearing Nos. H/1/702 and H/1/802 in the Respondent's project &

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS vs. NANI RESORTS AND FLORICULTURE PVT. LTD. [2019 (10) TR 20]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 21-10-2019 | | Order No. 52/2019

1. The present Report dated 22.04.2019, has been received on 23.04.2019 from the Applicant No. 8, i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. Vide the above report, the DGAP has reported that an application dated 04.06.2018 was filed before the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. BHARTIYA CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. [2019 (10) TR 17]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 14-10-2019 | | Order No.49/2019

1. The present Report dated 25.02.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Karnataka State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 29.06.2018 had forwarded an application dated 31.05.2018 filed by the Applicant No. 1 to the Standing Commi

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS vs. PARAMOUNT PROPBUILT PVT. LTD. [2019 (9) TR 119]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 26-09-2019 | | Order No.47/2019

1. The present Report dated 02.04.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed a complaint on 19.06.2018 before the Uttar Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. H.P. INDIA SALES PVT. LTD [2019 (7) TR 29]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 04-07-2019 | | Order No.46/2019

1. The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 15.02.2019 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of “HP V202b 19.5 inch Computer Monitor” (hereinafter referred to as the product) supplied by him. The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent had maintained the same selling price of ₹ 6,869/- for t