GST Library
Login | Register
About GST Library
Contact Us
Subscription (Price)
GST Updates
GSTR-3B Manual New
GSTR-9 Manual New
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Case Laws Sitemap
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
Classification by CTA
ITC Reversal Calculator New
E-invoice Applicability Calculator
Inverted Duty Refund Calculator
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Videos

GST e-Books

GST Domains Sale

About Us

Our Services

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
TM
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

7048924208

GST Case Laws

1
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option
Active Filters:
Court - NAA ✔

   259 Results

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CBIC vs. ELAN LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 5, 2022)

ORDER 1. This Authority vide its Final Order No. 85/2020 dated 11.12.2020 for the Respondent’s project "Mercado" directed to pass on an amount of Rs.2,44,80,835/- to the Applicant (Sh. Mool Chand Mittal) and other 228 commercial shop buyers along with the interest 18% per annum. 2. As the Respondent himself admitted that he had been constructions one more project namely "Epic", therefore, the Authority vide the said Order No. 85/2020 dated 11.12.2020, taking ...

DEEPAK NAIK AND OTHERS vs. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 4, 2022)

1. The present Report dated 18.11.2021 has been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation as per the directions contained in this Authority’s Internal Order No. 01/2021 dated 16.03.2021 in relation to Project- “Prestige Lake Ridge”, Location- Bengaluru, Karnataka of M/s. Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. 2. In the said Internal Order No. 01/2021 dated 16.03.2021 this Authority had determined that additional ITC benefit @3....

NILANG SHASTRI AND OTHERS vs. SWATI REALTY


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 29, 2022)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 27.11.2020 had been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules. 2017. The brief facts of the present case was that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 17.07.2020 to the DGAP for conducting a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the ...

NITESH KUMAR SINGHAL AND OTHER vs. SSBC REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 29, 2022)

The present Report dated 30.12.2020, has been furnished by the Applicant No. 03 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 03.12.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of applications filed under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 and ...
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 28.08.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP was directed by Order No. 52/2019 dated 21.10.2019 passed by this Authority under rule 133(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in the matter of Sandeep Kumar & Ors versus M/s Na...
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 02.09.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the DGAP (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case were that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti- profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Nap...

ARUN KUMAR RAINA AND OTHERS vs. M3M INDIA PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 27.10.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2, Le. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as the 'DGAP’) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 The brief facts of the case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering, received an Application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017 filed by Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering in respect o...

SHIVKUMAR TATTIMANI AND OTHERS vs. AXIS CONCEPT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER The present Report dated 29.01,2021 has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Karnataka State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”), by the Applicant N...

MANJU BALA, SHRI KUMAR KUNAL AND OTHERS vs. SJP HOTEL & RESORTS PVT LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 28.01.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 13 i.e., the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, received an Application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017 filed by the Applicant No. 1 & 2 alleging profiteering in respect of construction service s...

AJAY SOOD AND OTHERS vs. ELDECO COUNTY LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER The present Report dated 31.03.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation, under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering, received an application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Authority, alleging profiteering in respect of con...