TR Citation	-TR-
Court
State
Classification of Goods / Services
Related Section / Rule / Notification / HSN / SAC	OR OR
In Favour of	Also include where 'In favour of' is not defined (Recommended)
Date (From)
Date (To)
Petitioner / Applicant / Respondent's Name
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option	Search at least one of the words Search database with any of the words entered ! Search all words Search database with "all words" present together but in any order ! Search exact phrase Search database with "all words" present together and in the same order !

GST Case Laws

Found: 39 Result

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. EMKE SILKS & GARMENTS PVT. LTD. [2019 (2) TR 10]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 11-02-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.09/2019

1. The present report dated 08.11.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. EMKE SIKS & GARMENTS PVT. LTD [2019 (2) TR 11]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 11-02-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.10/2019

1. The present report dated 05.11.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) on 12.11.2018 after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Re

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. M/S SUDARSANS [2019 (2) TR 12]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 11-02-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.11/2019

1. The present report dated 08.11.2013 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANIT-PROFITEEING vs. M/S SUDARSANS [2019 (2) TR 8]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 04-02-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.07/2019

1. The present report dated 31.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEEING vs. M/S PULIMOOTTILL SILKS [2019 (2) TR 9]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 04-02-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.08/2019

1. The present report dated 30.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax(CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the supply o

KIRAN CHIMIRALA vs. JUBILANT FOODS WORKS LTD. [2019 (1) TR 25]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 31-01-2019 | In favour of Revenue | Order No.04/2019

1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 an application through e-mail dated 29.11 2017 (Annexure-I of the Report) was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent stating that he had purchased 1 SGB Stuffed GB (Garlic Bread) and 1 Med NHT Veg Extrava (Medium Veg Pizza) after paying ₹ 129/- and ₹ 440/- per item respectively vide tax Invoice No. 66065/17/66210 dated 20.10.2017 (Annexure-2 of the Report) from the

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. M/S SUDARSANS [2019 (1) TR 26]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 31-01-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.05/2019

1. The present report dated 31.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Proflteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANIT-PROFITEEING vs. M/S S.J SPICES LTD. [2019 (1) TR 27]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 31-01-2019 | In favour of Assessee | Order No.06/2019

1. The present report dated 30.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup

DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. SATYA ENTERPRISES [2019 (1) TR 24]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 22-01-2019 | In favour of Revenue | Order No.03/2019

1. The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was made by this Authority to the Director General Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), erstwhile Director General Safeguards, under rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 intimating that certain major manufacturers of Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) have not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate from 28% to 18% w.e.f. 15.11.2017, by maintaining the prices of their products at the pre-GST rate reduction

SURYA PRAKASH LOONKER vs. EXCEL RASAYAN PVT. LTD. [2019 (1) TR 2]

Court: NAA | State: Not Applicable | Dt: 16-01-2019 | In favour of Revenue | Order No.2/2019

1. The present Report, dated 04.09.2018, has been received on 07.09.2018 from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 22.02.2018 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee, constituted under Rule 123 (1) of the above Rules alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of reduction in the GS

DGGST arrests one person for availing and passing fake ITC of Rs.16 Crore.

Notification issued to extend the date of blocking and unblocking on e-way bill facility to 21.08.2019.

Press Release of 35th GST Council Meeting held on 21st June 2019

Issues reported in filing Form GSTR 9C by the taxpayers : Advisory by Team GSTN

Issues reported in filing Form GSTR 9 by the taxpayers: Advisory by Team GSTN

New GST Return Transition Phase applicable from Oct 2019

Latest amendments in GST enacted on 07.03.2019

Recommendations of the 33rd GST Council meeting held on 24.02.2019

GSTR-3B due date for January 2019 has been extended upto 22.02.2019

New GST Input-Output Set off Rules w.e.f. 01.02.2019

Cabinet approves creation of the National Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT)

Delhi High Court stays demand in the case of Hindustan Unilever (HUL) for Profiteering imposed by NAA

Major decisions taken in 32nd GST Council Meeting

Bank account details are not required for GST Registration now

Standard Operating Procedure on TDS updated as on 27.12.2018 issued by CBIC

Guidelines and procedure of applications for financial assistance under the Central Scheme named Seva Bhoj Yojna for reimbursement of central tax and Central Government share of integrated tax paid on the purchase of raw food items.

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Rate changes and clarification in Goods

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - GST rate on services

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - Certain important issues referred by GST Council to various Committees / GoM

31st GST Council Meeting held on 22 December 2018 - In-Principle approval given for Law Amendments