GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 121

GST Case Laws


1
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
Court - SC ✔

  89 Results

ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, we are not inclined to interfere. 2. Special Leave Petition is accordingly, dismissed. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ...
ORDER We have heard learned A.S.G. appearing for the petitioners and perused the material on record. Having regard to the peculiar facts of this case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The reason why we are saying so is that although the scheme was between March, 2020 to August, 2020, in the instant case, the respondents had sought benefit or extension of the scheme only by one month, that is, September, 2020. Further in paragraph ‘89’ the High Court ...
ORDER 1. This petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India assailing paragraph ‘2’ of the Notification No. 11 of 2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 issued under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as being unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution of India. 2. We are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. 3. Hence, the same is dismissed reserving liberty to the pe...
ORDER Delay condoned. We have heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case(s) and the extent of demand being on the lower side, we are not inclined to interfere in these matters in exercise of our powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed, accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of ...
O R D E R Delay condoned. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant very fairly submitted that the issues which arise in these appeals are covered by the judgment of this Court in Union of India & Anr. V/s . Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Private Limited (2018) 4 SCC 669 and, therefore, an appropriate order may be passed in these appeals. In the circumstances, the Civil Appeals are dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. ...
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s), we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petitions are hence dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. ...
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Ms. Liz Mathew, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that having regard to the impugned order, permission may now be granted to the petitioner herein to file an appeal, within a period of four weeks from today and if such an appeal is filed, the issue regarding limitation may not be raised. Her submission is placed on record. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner herein to file an ap...
ORDER Leave granted. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present appeal emanates from the final judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court at Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the “High Court”) in Writ Petition bearing W.P.A. No. 17452 of 2019 dated 2nd August, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Judgment”), by which the said petition was dismissed. BRIEF FACTS: 4. The appellant, being ...
ORDER Leave granted. Though respondent(s)/State is served, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent(s). This is for the third time. In the circumstances, we have heard only learned counsel for the appellant. Appellant’s counsel drew our attention to an order dated 21.08.2023 passed in CWP No. 17853/2023 by the very same Bench of the High Court, wherein a direction was issued to the petitioner therein to deposit 25% of the total amount by way of cash and for the...
JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. Table of Contents I. Background and relevant provisions ..................................................................................... 2 II. Facts ................................................................................................................................ 9 III. Arguments of the appellant-states .................................................................................... 11 IV. Arguments of the respondent...


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)