GST Library
2 Col
3 Col

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscribe

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications

Act & Rules (Single-view)

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos
GST Domains Sale
About Us
Our Services
Contact Us
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
2.0
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

7048924208
GST Library Prices are increasing from 01st July 2023.
Subscribe Now

GST Case Laws


1
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Tripura ✔

  38 Results

TEJASWITA MOTORS vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA & OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | May 1, 2023)

ORDER Heard Mr. B.N. Majumder, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Karnajit De, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the respondents-State. 2. By the impugned show-cause notice dated 21.02.2023 bearing reference No.ZA160223001550C (Annexure-3), the GST registration of the petitioner has been suspended by respondent No.3, the Superintendent of Taxes, Sales Tax Officer Class II, Ambassa Headquarter, Dhalai. 3. Mr. B.N. Majumder...

KAMRUL NAHAR vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Apr 11, 2023)

ORDER Heard Mr. Biplabendu Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bidyut Majumder, learned Deputy S.G.I. appearing for the respondent No.1-Union of India, Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents No.2, 3, 4 & 6 and Mr. Paramartha Datta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.5. 2. By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the (i) N...
Order Heard Mr. H. Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned G.A. assisted by Mr. K. De, learned Addl. G.A.; Mr. Bidyut Majumder, learned Dy. SGI and Mr. P. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the legality and validity of the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.70/GHY(A)/Addl. Commr./CGST-AGT/2022, dated 30.0...

SR CONSTRUCTIONS vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Apr 4, 2023)

ORDER By way of filing the writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 01.02.2022, passed by the respondent no.3, the Additional Commissioner (Appeals), CGST, Central Excise and Customs, Guwahati. i.e. the appellate authority. Fact of the case is that the petitioner is a construction company. They have a works contract agreement with the M/s Hotel Polo Pvt. Ltd. and constructed a hotel at Agartala. In the process of construction they procu...

SWAPAN CHANDRA DE vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA & OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Mar 29, 2023)

JUDGMENT (Amarnath Goud, ACJ) Heard Mr. BN Majumder, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. Paul, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned GA assisted by Mr. K. Dey, learned Additional GA appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. By means of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(i) Issue Rule NISI; (ii) Issue RULE calling upon the Respondent and each one of them to show cause...
JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL) (T. AMARNATH GOUD, ACJ) Heard Mr. Ashok Saraf, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. P. Baruah, learned counsel and Mr. Kousik Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. K. Dey, learned Additional GA, appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. By means of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the “authorization for inspection and search” dated 25.06.2021 issued by the Additional Commissioner of State...
ORDER Heard Mr. B.N. Majumder, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. K. De, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is a sole proprietorship firm and is engaged in the business of sale of different types of glasses. The respondent authorities had seized the vehicle and the goods on 20.09.2019 on the ground of expiry mismatch of E-way bill with tax invoice. The petitioner has prayed for provisional release of the goods and the ve...
ORDER The petitioner, by filing the present writ petition has prayed for following reliefs: “i) Issue Rule NISI; ii) Issue a Rule calling upon the Respondents and each one of them to show cause as to why a Writ of Certiorari and/or in the nature thereof, shall not be issued, cancelling, quashing, setting aside the impugned show cause notice vide reference No.ZA1608220009060, dated 11.08.2022 (Annexure-2, supra) and the subsequent act of the respondent No.3 for suspending the...
:

Cancellation of Registration

:

Non-filing of GST Returns

JUDGMENT AND ORDER(ORAL) The petitioner herein is a registered transporter in the name and style of M/S Western Carriers(India) located at 67/28 Strand Road Kolkata. The petitioner-transporter was booked with consignment No.1/ONG-0080/21 against SL. No.461859 dated 24.09.2021 from the Office of Transportation and Shipping, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, located at Technopolis Building, 4th Floor, Sector-V, Salt Lake Kolkata for delivery of said shipment at ONGC, Tripura Asset, Badhargha...
JUDGMENT AND ORDER(ORAL) The case of the petitioner in this instant writ petition is that the vehicles carrying taxable goods of the petitioner entered the State of Tripura a few days later than anticipated and during which period, the validity of the ‘e-Way bills’ had expired. However, the vehicle was carrying duty-paid goods and there was no attempt to evade duty. Despite this, the authorities imposed fresh levy of duty with the penalty. The petitioner filed a writ petition ...