GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 121

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  9,362 Results

DINESH JAIN & MS. MADHU JAIN AND OTHERS vs. SANGHVI PREMISES PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER 1. The Present report dated 23.02.2021 had been received by the Authority from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The brief facts if the case was that the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, received an Application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”). filed by Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of constr...

AJAY SOOD AND OTHERS vs. ELDECO COUNTY LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER The present Report dated 31.03.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation, under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering, received an application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Authority, alleging profiteering in respect of con...

MANJU BALA, SHRI KUMAR KUNAL AND OTHERS vs. SJP HOTEL & RESORTS PVT LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 28.01.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 13 i.e., the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, received an Application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017 filed by the Applicant No. 1 & 2 alleging profiteering in respect of construction service s...

SHIVKUMAR TATTIMANI AND OTHERS vs. AXIS CONCEPT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER The present Report dated 29.01,2021 has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Karnataka State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”), by the Applicant N...

ARUN KUMAR RAINA AND OTHERS vs. M3M INDIA PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 27.10.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2, Le. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as the 'DGAP’) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 The brief facts of the case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering, received an Application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017 filed by Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering in respect o...
1. This application has been filed to condone the delay of 643 days in filing the instant appeal. 2. We have heard Mr. K. K. Maiti, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Akshat Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application. Though we find the reasons to be not very convincing, we exercise discretion in the matter on account of the reasoned order passed by the Hon&rsqu...
Writ petition was preferred for the following relief (s). (a) For a declaration that Rule 117 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 to the extent it prescribes a period of limitation for claiming of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in Form GST TRAN-1 is ultra vires to Section 140 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as the said Section does not authorise the rule-making authority to prescribe a time limit within which such FORM GST TRAN-1 is to be filed in order to claim ...

VINUTHA PRAHLAD AND OTHERS vs. MJR BUILDERS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 25, 2022)

ORDER l. The Report dated 01.06.2020, has been received on 02.06.2020 from Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. 2. The brief facts of the case and findings of investigation conducted by the DGAP are as under:- i. An application was received on 09.10.2019 from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 ...
Heard Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed to quash the order dated 15.07.2021 passed by the respondent no.3 under Section 73 of CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 for the Assessment Year 2017-18 (July, 2017 to March, 2018) and 2019-2020. In paragraph nos. 32 and 34 of the counter affidavit, the respondents have stated as under:- 32. That subsequently, after examining and verifying...

CHINTANKUMAR KARSHANBHAI DARAJI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jul 22, 2022)

ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA Heard learned advocate Mr. H.J. Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Krutik Parikh, learned AGP for the respondents for the purpose of admission of the petition and/or otherwise for grant of interim relief. 2. The principal prayer of the petitioner is to set aside the notice dated 11.04.2022 in FORM GST MOV-10 as well as order dated 10.04.2022 in FORM GST MOV-6, whereby the goods and conveyance of the petitioner came t...


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)