GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 121

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  9,362 Results

Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioners have challenged the impugned adjudication order dated 9th May, 2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority concerned, on the ground that the same has been passed in violation of principle of natural justice by not affording opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners in spite of specific request from the petitioners in their reply to the show-cause-notice dated 13th April, 2021 as appears at page 33...
The petitioner has filed the present petition against the following order:- [i] Order dated 10.12.2020 passed in case No.14/2020 by Authority for Advance Ruling, M.P. [ii] Order dated 26.07.2021 passed in case No. MP/AAAR/05/2021 by M.P. Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling. The Petitioner is a Works Contractor engaged in executing works related to the construction of the irrigation dam. The petitioner is duly registered under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in various ...
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Joint Commissioner of State (Appeal), Jamshedpur Division, Jamshedpur by the impugned order dated 26th July, 2019 (Annexure-14) passed in Appeal Case No. IB-GST-A-02/2018-19 has confirmed the order of penalty dated 12th July, 2018 passed by the State Tax Officer, Intelligence Bureau, Jamshedpur Division, Jamshedpur (Annexure-10), also impugned herein, wherein a penalty of Rs. 8,25,828/- has been imposed under Section 129(1)(b) of CGST Act. Petitio...
1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. J.M. Panchal with learned Advocate Mr. Chetan K. Pandya on behalf of the applicant and learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Mitesh Amin with learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Ronak Raval on behalf of the respondent- State 2. The present application has been preferred by the applicant apprehending his arrest in connection with the File No.DCST/ENF-1/AC- 4/SUMMONS/2021-22/B-597 registered with the office of the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Enforceme...
Both the writ petitions, namely, W.P. No.9226 of 2020 and W.P. No.9231 of 2020 involve common question of facts as well as law and, therefore, are being decided by this common order. 2. These petitions assail not only the show cause notices issued but also the consequential orders passed by the competent authority refusing claim for refund of accumulated credit of compensation cess. 3. The principal grounds of challenge to the aforesaid show cause notices and subsequent orders are tha...
ORDER The petitioner claims to be engaged in supply and manufacture of enamelled copper for which the raw material is copper scrap. It had purchased copper scrap weighing 25,110 Kilograms that was transported in a vehicle intercepted by the Roving Squad at Dharmapuri on 13.05.2022. The transporter was in possession of e-invoice and e-way bill that was handed over for physical verification. The vehicle was however detained, the reason citing 'suspected transaction'. An order o...
Apprehending arrest in connection with the Summons dated 28th February, 2022 and 15th March, 2022 issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘C.G.S.T. Act’ for short), applicant had preferred Anticipatory Bail Application before the Sessions Court at Nashik, with Ajjimullah Naim Choudhary and Hafijullah Ajjimullah Choudhary. Their application was rejected on 5th April, 2022. Co-applicants, Ajjimullah Naim Choudhary and Hafijullah Ajjimullah Choudhary ...
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 3rd March, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Enforcement, under Section 74(9) of the State GST Act, on the ground that the same is without jurisdiction by contending that the initiation of proceeding in question under the State GST Act is without jurisdiction and he cannot act as an officer under the State GST...
Mr.V.Prasanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents and is fully armed with instructions to enable consideration of the relief sought for in this writ petition. Thus, by consent expressed and in fact at request, final orders are passed disposing this writ petition, though it is listed for admission. 2. The petitioner claims to have purchased iron scrap from various dealers and states that it was in the process of transporting the same from Guwahati to Coimb...
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Both these Writ Petitions being WPA No. 17567 of 2021 filed by the CGST authorities and WPA No. 12676 of 2021 filed by the assessee company arise out of the same impugned order dated 5th February, 2021 with corrigendum orders dated 17th February, 2021 and 29th July, 2021, passed by the Appellate authority being Joint Commissioner of Income, CGST & CX, Appeal-I, Kolkata, in Appeal No. 12/CGST/Kol-North/2021 filed by the assessee company ...


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)