GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 122

SHRI DHARMENDRA GAUD, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS vs. M/S. JMK HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.
(National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.N.SHARMA
J.C.CHAUHAN
AMAND SHAH
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
Na
COUNSEL
Na

Petitioner / Applicant

SHRI DHARMENDRA GAUD, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS

Respondent M/S. JMK HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.
Court

NAA (National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Date Dec 26, 2019
Order No.

80/2019

TR Citation 2019 (12) TR 1264
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

ORDER

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 25.04.2019 and supplementary Report dated 26 06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application dated 10.042018 before the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and submitted that he had purchase a flat in the Respondent’s project “Grand IV A” situated in Sector-103, Dwarka Expressway, Gurugram, Haryana and alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit to him by way of commensurate reduction in price, in terms of Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and had charged GST on the pre-GST base price of ₹ 4000 per sq. ft. The Haryana State Screening Comm....
Download Full Judgement :
29
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S