GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 123

MITTAL FOOTWEAR vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
AMIT MAHAJAN
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
Asha Jain Madan
Mukesh Jain
Bhavika Kohli
COUNSEL
Nidhi Banga
Anushree Narain
Mayank Srivastava

Petitioner / Applicant

MITTAL FOOTWEAR

Respondent UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court Delhi High Court
State

Delhi

Date Mar 16, 2023
Order No.

W.P.(C) 14307/2021

TR Citation 2023 (3) TR 7117
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

ORDER

ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a common Order-in-Appeal dated 05.01.2021, whereby the appeals (nine in number) filed against an Order-in-Original rejecting its applications for refund were rejected. 2. The applications filed by the petitioner for refund were rejected, principally, on the ground that the period covered under the refund applications did not match with the tax period for which GSTR-1 were filed. The petitioner had filed GSTR-1 on a quarterly basis but the refunds were applied on a monthly basis. 3. Ms Narain, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, states that she has received a signed copy of the affidavit affirmed in compliance of the order dated 15.02.2023, however, she has been unable to file the same with the Registry of this Court. She has handed over a copy of the same. 4. Paragraph 5 of the said affidavit reads as under: “5. However, as the Hon’ble Court has directed to provid....
Download Full Judgement :
18
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2024 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2024 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2024 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).