Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Case Laws / Advance Rulings ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,317 cases mapped to 12,188 taggings
Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   271 Results

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directly against the order passed by the Proper Authority and first appellate authority, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, since the G.S.T. Tribunal has not been constituted so far by the Central Government for the State of Uttar Pradesh. It is urged that statutory right of the petitioner to approach the Tribunal cannot be taken away once the Act itself ha...

Sep 24, 2020  

Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Sri M.K. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer:- (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 14.04.2020 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no.3. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2...

Sep 7, 2020  

The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order dated 03.07.2020 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, Mughal Sarai, Chandauli. The order demands the tax liability of the petitioner and also imposes a penalty. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the order is beyond jurisdiction, inasmuch as, the proceedings are culminated in the impunged order dated 03.07.2020, arose out of Section 129 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The submission ...

Sep 2, 2020  

Heard Sri Ashwani Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5. The petitioner herein claims to be a registered firm under the GST having Registration No. 09AMEPK9117A1ZA. The petitioner claims that it is liable for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the purchase of goods from the manufacturer. At the time of enactment of GST Act, 2017, the petitioner w...

Sep 1, 2020  

Heard Sri Atul Kumar Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent department. Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to obtain instructions for a period of two months. His prayer for further one week time to obtain instructions is therefore turned down. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.09.2019 of provisional attachment of the property under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services...

Sep 1, 2020  

Heard Sri Manish Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5. The petitioner herein claims to be a registered firm under the GST having Registration No. 09AMEPK9117A1ZA. The petitioner claims that it is liable for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the purchase of goods from the manufacturer. At the time of enactment of GST Act, 2017, the petitioner...

Sep 1, 2020  

1. Heard Shri Naresh Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. Heard on the question of admission. 3. Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2 has submitted that the petitioner is challenging the constitutional validity under section 16 (2) (c) of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and therefore, the pet...

Jul 31, 2020  

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jagdish Mishra learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Dinesh Varun for the respondent no. 5. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 26.9.2019 passed in Appeal No.17/2019 by the respondent no.3 under Section 129 (3) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act and C.G.S.T. Act, 2017/ Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. It is not disputed that the impugned order is appealable under...

Jul 13, 2020  

Written Submission and Rejoinder affidavit filed today be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinod Kant, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri Mata Prasad Standing Counsel. The petitioner had a registration under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which when the Assessing Authority cancelled on 10.10.2018 under Section 29(2)(c) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act), the petitioner filed an application f...

Jul 8, 2020  

Written submissions filed today be kept on record. The petitioner had a registration under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which when the Assessing Authority cancelled on 16.4.2019 under Section 29(2)(c) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act), the petitioner filed an application for the revocation of the cancellation order. When, however, the application was rejected on 27.5.2019, the petitioner filed a First Appeal under Section 107 of ...

Jul 8, 2020