GST Library
Taxreply tweets
About GST Library
GST News
GST Calender New
E-Books
Subscription Plans
GST Case Laws
GST Notifications
GST Act / Rules
GST Rates
GST Set-off Calculator
GST Forms
Full Site Search
Classification (Chapters)
Classification (Search)
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd.

GST Case Laws

Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   264 Results

Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents and is armed with instructions to proceed with the matter. By consent, the above Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal even at the stage of admission. 2. The challenge in these Writ Petition is to three orders of assessment, all dated 18.10.2019, passed by the State Tax Officer (R1) in terms of the provisions of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for the periods 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. 3...

Feb 2, 2021  

Heard Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap, learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. The petitioner challenges order dated 24.08.2020 and the main ground argued is violation of principles of natural justice on the ground that the petitioner was not heard in person prior to passing of the impugned order. Reliance is placed on the provisions of Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short ‘CGST Act’)...

Jan 19, 2021  

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...

Dec 18, 2020  

ARAVIND DRILLERS


(AAR | Tamilnadu)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless...

Dec 18, 2020  

VALLALAR BOREWELLS


(AAR | Tamilnadu)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless...

Dec 18, 2020  

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless...

Dec 18, 2020  

These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned assessment orders dated 19.11.2019 passed under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for the assessment years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. 2. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions are one and the same, they are disposed of by a common order. 3. Heard Mr. S. Karunakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. J. Padmavathi Devil, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent. 4. The case ...

Dec 11, 2020  

This writ petition has been filed challenging the Order in Appeal, dated 20.08.2020 passed by the first respondent, confirming the order, dated 27.03.2019 passed by the second respondent, rejecting the petitioner's application for refund under the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. 2. Heard Mr.Derrick Sam, learned counsel representing Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Aravindan, learned Senior Panel counsel for the respondents. 3. The...

Dec 10, 2020  

These writ petitions have been filed challenging the assessment orders, all dated 31.10.2020, passed by the respondent for the assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20. 2. Heard Mr.S.Karunakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. By consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 4. The petitioner has ch...

Dec 8, 2020  

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo under cover of email dated 04.12.2020 upon instructions from the petitioner reading thus, ‘1.The Petitioner filed the Form GST TRAN-1 on 27.12.2017 declaring carried forward credit of ₹ 82,91,19,712/- in terms of Section 140(1) and (3) of the CGST Act, 2017. 2.The Petitioner filed periodical return in Form GSTR 3B for the period July 2017 to November 2017 wherein Petitioner discharged output liability of ₹ 86,96,78,402/- in...

Dec 4, 2020