Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    
Subscription Plans   
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Case Laws ✓
GST Notifications / Circulars
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules (Amendments)
GST Rates
Classification (Chapter Wise)
Classification (Search Tool)
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
Finance Bill
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Case Laws
3,286 cases mapped to 12,093 taggings
Citation
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

   97 Results

M/S AGRAWAL OIL MILL vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

Shri Gaurav Mishra, learned counsel for petitioners in all the petitions. Shri Ankur Mody, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents/State. Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard through video conferencing. 1. All the three petitions have been filed by the same petitioner assailing tax liability alongwith interest and penalty of different assessment years (2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) as contained in the impugned order (Annexure-P/1), dated 11/8/2020 pass...

Sep 15, 2020  

Heard on the question of admission. By filing this petition, the petitioner has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents to allow it to avail the short transitioning of input tax credit ("ITC) by either updating electronic credit ledger at their back end, in accord with the details of credit submitted by the petitioner or allowing them to revise form GST TRAN-1, in conformity with the returns filed under the existing laws that ...

Aug 27, 2020  

The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent No.4 – Assistant Director, DGGSTI, Indore and respondent No.5 – Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGSTI, Indore to release the cash amounting to ₹ 66,43,130/- seized from the petitioner vide Panchnama dated 30/05/2020 from the residential premises of the petitioner and her husband. 02-The petitioner is the wife of Shri Sanjay Matta. Sh...

Aug 26, 2020  

Hearing convened through video conferencing. 2. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [for short “the CrPC”] on behalf of the applicants, namely, Jagdish Arora and Ajay Kumar Arora, who have been taken into judicial custody in connection with Crime No.DGGI/BhZU/1204/03/2020-21/SDPL, registered at the Central Goods and Service Tax, Bhopal, in respect of the offence punishable under Section 132(1)(a) read with section 132(1)...

Aug 18, 2020  

NITESH WADHWANI vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

1. This is the first application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. The learned S...

Aug 13, 2020  

KISHORE WADHWANI vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

1. This is the first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a) (i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. The learned Senior Counsel for the pet...

Aug 13, 2020  

VIJAY KUMAR NAIR vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

1. This is the first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. At the outset, learned Senior Counsel f...

Aug 13, 2020  

AMIT BOTHRA, ASHOK DAGAR vs. STATE OF MP


(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

1. Both these petitions have arisen out of the same crime number of the same office/police station, therefore, they are heard together and are being decided by this common order. 2. These are the first applications under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "GST Act"), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General o...

Jul 27, 2020  

The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India claiming following reliefs:- “1. To direct the respondents No.2 to grant an opportunity to the petitioner to file Trans 1 before due date i.e. 31.03.2020. 2. Yours Lordship may be please to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to allow filing in Form GST Trans 1 to enable to claim transitional credit of eligible duties in respect of inputs held in stock on the appointed ...

Jul 15, 2020  

By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 20th June, 2020 whereby the premises of the petitioner has been sealed under the provisions of The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short “GST Act”). [2] The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the manufacturer of sweet betel nut and which has all the necessary licenses and permissions for this purpose and is regularly paying the GST. Further case of the petitioner is that the Plot No.15...

Jul 3, 2020