GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 120

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  9,302 Results

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P2 detention notice issued to him detaining the goods and the vehicle at a place called Vazhayila. It is the case of the petitioner that the reason shown in Ext.P2 notice for detention is that the e-Way Bill in respect of the consignment showed that it was to cover a transportation from Pazhoor- Peppathi to Vettoor road- Kaniyapuram whereas the vehicle was detained at Vazhayila which was not on that route. It is the explanation of the ...

M/S. ROTARY CLUB OF MUMBAI QUEENS NECKLACE


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 6, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be...
1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of an application for modification of order dated 20.09.2019 passed by this court, moved by petitioner under article 226 of the constitution of India read with section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 for writ of mandamus directing the respondents to not cause any physical, mental or verbal harassment to the petitioner during pendency of the investigation. 2. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner in his petition that the ...

ARORA & CO vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Nov 6, 2019)

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs: “i) To issue writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(s) to allow the Petitioner to file declaration in form GST Tran 1, to enable it to claim transitional credit of excise duty in respect of inputs held in closing stock on the appointed day in terms of Section 140(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; ii) To issue a writ, order or direction quashing the Im...
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to submit its TRAN-1 Form on the GSTN Portal in terms of Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, “the CGST Act, 2017) and the Andhra Pradesh State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, “the APSGST Act”) (or) in the alternative, to permit the petitioner to submit ...

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TA.. vs. GYAN BOOKS PVT LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 6, 2019)

1. The present Report dated 11.06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of its meeting held on 11.03.2019 had forwarded an application dated 28.02.2019 filed by the Applicant No. 1, to the DGAP. The Applicant No. 1 had st...
:

OTHER

ICICI BANK AND ANR. vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 5, 2019)

(1) The secured creditor along with receiver has approached this Court aggrieved against the action of the respondents in detaining the mortgaged vehicle, which was moved from one place to the other for taking effective physical possession of the vehicle in compliance of the order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal. It is contended that such movement would not be covered under the element of “supply” covered under the GST Scheme. (2) At the time of hearing, learned counsel f...
The applicants are before this Court against the wilful defiance of the order dated 14.2.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ (Tax) Petition No.562 of 2018 (M/s DM Advertisers Agency & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.), which for ready reference is quoted as under:- "Heard Sri C.K. Parekh, learned counsel for the appellants. Sri Vashistha Tiwari has appeared for Mathura Vrindavan Nagar Nigam whereas learned Standing counsel for the State of U.P. The Additional ...
1. This Report dated 21.02.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 5 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 20.06.2018 had referred 03 applications filed by the Applicant No. 1, 2 & 3, to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 12...
:

CONSTRUCTION

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOA.. vs. MAN REALTY LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 5, 2019)

1. The present Report dated 03.04.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 18.07.2018 filed before the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respond...
:

CONSTRUCTION



20
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Mar 2024 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Mar 2024 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

22 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2024 (QRMP Taxpayer < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category I States.

* State Category I - Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana or Andhra Pradesh or the Union territories of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Puducherry, Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.

24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2024 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2024) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the FY 2023-24 (For taxpayers upto 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)