GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 121

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  9,361 Results

VIKAS GOEL vs. SHANKAR PRASAD SARMA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 10, 2020)

This is a second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in a complaint case No. COMA-137- 2018 registered on 13.11.2018 (Annexure P.2) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the present case, the complaint has been filed by the Deputy Director, Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence...

ABB INDIA LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 10, 2020)

1. Rule returnable on 12/02/2020. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.2, 3, and 5. The respondents nos.1 and 4 shall be served by Registered Post Acknowledgment with Due. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we are of the view that the writ-applicant has made out a strong prima-facie case to have some interim order in its favour. 3. The...

M/S. PARKER HANNIFIN INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 10, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 101 or the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it Clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017) are the Same except for Certain provisions Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference ...
:

OIL, GAS & MINING

M/S TIRUPATI TRADERS vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR


(Patna High Court | Jan 9, 2020)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- (i) For issuance of writ of certiorari, quashing of Assessment Order dated 25.08.2018 and demand notice dated 24.01.2019 for Assessment Year 2013-14 (Annexure- 1 series). (ii) For quashing of assessment order dated 23.08.2018 and demand notice dated 24.01.2019 for Assessment Year 2014-15 (Annexure 1/1 series). (iii) For condoning the delay in fi...
The petition filed on 11.09.2019 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- i) the order dated 16.07.2019 (as contained Annexure-3 Series) passed by the respondent no.2 for the period 2019-20 under section 129(3) of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter called the Act) be quashed. ii) the notice of demand d...
Heard Mr. Ashok Mohanty, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Commercial Tax-State. According to Mr. Mohanty, a show cause notice dated 04.11.2019 vide Annexure-3 was issued to the petitioners under Section 73 of the OGST Act, 2017 for non-payment of OGST/CGST for the period June, 2018 to December, 2018 making two things clear. First, that the reply has to be submitted to the show cause notice by ...

RAJKUMAR MAHESHWARI vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 9, 2020)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “7(a) to quash and set aside the Show Cause Notice dated 04/09/2019 (Annexure “A”) issued by the respondent No.3; (b) pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, to stay the implementation and operation of the Show Cause Notice at Annexure “A” to this petition; (c) direct the respondent No.3 to release...
:

TRANSPORTATION / STORAGE

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following relief(s): “15(A) To issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing to quash and set aside an order of Confiscation of Goods and Conveyance and demand of tax, fine and penalty issued under Form GST MOV-11 dated 21.10.2019 by respondent no.3 at Annexure-J. (B) To issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order...
:

AGRICULTURE

AK OVERSEAS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 9, 2020)

ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 as well as Sri C. B. Tripathi, Advocate appearing as Special Counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a provision under Rule 140 of the Central Goods and Services Rules, 2017 empowering the proper officer, which in the present case, is respondent no. 3 to release the seized goods on pr...
The case projected in this Writ Petition (Civil) filed under Article 226 is as follows. The petitioner is an assessee under the CGST/SGST Acts on the rolls of the 1st respondent herein. The 2nd respondent has awarded two separate works to the petitioner and as against the said contracts ₹ 8,11,206/- and ₹ 2,98,848/- were deducted by the 2nd respondent herein under Sec.51 of the Act as evidenced by Exts.P2 and P2 (a). But the petitioner was not extended credit against the above, by the...


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)