GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 120

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  9,349 Results

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Gazebo Hotel and Resorts, G-1, Subhash Nagar, Shopping Centre, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur-302016 (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order No. ZA990420005834K dated 20.04,2020 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax Division-d, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as "the adjudi...
:

Cancellation of Registration

STATE EXAMINATION BOARD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Nov 5, 2020)

The applicant M/s. State Examination Board is located Opposite State Government Library, Sector-21, Gandhinagar-382021. The applicant has stated that on formation of Gujarat State on 01.05.1960, a department named Education and labour department came into existence and social welfare, labour, prohibition, excise and employment were included in Education Department and later subjects were gradually taken away from the Education and Labour Department on administrative grounds; that since August...
:

SERVICES (EDUCATION)

SH. DEEPAK KUMAR KHURANA


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 5, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here­in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 25.02.2019. furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit in respect of the flat purchased by him in the “Laurel Heigh...
:

CONSTRUCTION

:

Input Tax Credit

APSARA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 5, 2020)

(Proceeding under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has b...
:

CHARITABLE TRUST /NPO

Heard. Rule, Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this Petition is being disposed of finally. 2. By our order dated 5th November, 2020, we have passed a detailed order in Writ Petition (St.) No. 3705 of 2020. 3. Petitioner is a Limited Liability Partnership and is inter alia, engaged in the same business as the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.3705 of 2020 and having similar tax registrations. 4. Since all other facts are similar to the orde...
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By the consent of the Counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the inaction on the part of the Respondent authorities in not giving Input tax credit to the claim of the Petitioner pursuant to the Board Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST dated 3rd April, 2018, the Petitioner has sought to not only challenge the said inaction but also to challenge the vires of Rule 117 and Rule 118 of t...
:

Input Tax Credit

1. Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 2. Case No. IV(06)121/AE/Alwar/2020 was registered for offence under Section 132(1)(b)(c)(f) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner- Hemant Kumar Singhal that case of the petitioner would not travel beyond Section 132(1)(f) of C.G.S.T. Act, the maximum punishment for which as provided under the Act is only six months. It is contended that petitioner has...
:

Bail Application

LALAN KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Nov 4, 2020)

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of an appellate order dated 05.03.2020 issued vide memo number 51 Bhagalpur whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected; b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the ex parte order of assessment dated 14.09.2019 issued vide reference number 690 in form GST ASMT- 13 by the Respondent No. 3.   c) For hold...

SH. AJAY KUMAR AND OTHER vs. PIVOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 4, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 19.06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 3 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide their applications dated 09.10.2018 and 16.12.2019 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 and 2 had alleged profiteering by the ...
:

CONSTRUCTION

:

Input Tax Credit

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the assessment order passed by the second respondent on 08.11.2019. The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order on the ground that it is ex-facie, arbitrary and illegal and amounts to gross violation of principles of natural justice. 2. Heard Mr.B.Rooban, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. It is the contention of the pe...
:

Principle of Natural Justice

:

Opportunity of being heard



24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2024 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2024) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the FY 2023-24 (For taxpayers upto 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)