GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 120

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  9,302 Results

ROHIT RASTOGI vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 5, 2022)

Heard. The correction application is allowed. Necessary correction has been incorporated in the order dated 30.03.2022. The correct order shall read as under:- "Heard Shri Bijendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the complainant and Shri I.P. Srivastava, learned AGA for the State. A case was lodged against the applicant as Case Crime No.928 of 2021 at Police Station Kaushambi District Ghaziabad, Directorate Gene...
:

Bail Application

1. This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode. 2. In the garb questioning the propriety of Revised Guidelines relating to works contract vide the Office Memorandum bearing No.38535-FIN-CT1-TAX-0045-2017/F., dated 10.12.2018 issued by the Government of Odisha in Finance Department, the petitioner has sought for issue of writ of mandamus by invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution with the following reliefs: “It is, therefore, prayed that, this Hon’b...
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 27.03.2018 passed by the respondent no. 4 along with appellate order dated 29.04.2019 passed in appeal no. 78/18 of 2017-18- 183 by respondent no. 3." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not propose to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit....
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in GSTIN:33ARHPA1055B1ZP/2019-20 dated 09.12.2021 and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to allow the petitioner to adjust the credit amount of Rs.40,505/- which was blocked and then pass further orders. 2. The petitioner is a dealer under the TNGST regime (in short 'the Act'). In respect of Assessment Year 2019-2020, a notice wa...

AJAJ AHAMAD vs. STATE OF ODISHA (CGST)


(Orissa High Court | Apr 4, 2022)

1. The present Petitioner, who is in custody since 12.01.2021, has filed the instant bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. corresponding to 2(C)CC Case No.51 of 2020 pending in the court of the Learned S.D.J.M., Panposh, Rourkela for commission of offences under Sections 132(1)(C) and 132(1)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act, 2017” for brevity). Prior to the instant application, the Petitioner had approached the le...
:

Bail Application

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 2.In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order of demand of tax and penalty under Section 129 of the respective GST Acts. By the impugned order, the respondent has demanded a sum of ₹ 12,46,678/- [₹ 6,23,339+₹ 6,23,339]. 3.The petitioner is a new start up company and is engaged in research and develop...
:

Detention of Vehicle & Goods

:

Demand & Interest

DRY BLEND FOODS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Apr 1, 2022)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST/SGST Act) and the rules made there under filed by M/s Dry Blend Foods Pvt. Ltd., Village Chandpur, P.O.-Hempur, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand-244716, (herein after referred to as the “applicant”), a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and registered with GST1N- 05AACCD88...

GOLDEN STEELS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER


(Madras High Court | Apr 1, 2022)

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records from the office of the Respondent and quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2021 with GSTIN 33AYRPM9435G1ZZ/2018-19 and 08.07.2021 with GSTIN 33AYRPM9435G1ZZ/2019-2020 passed by the respondent and directing the respondents to strictly comply with the provisions of GST Act and the principles of natural justice and ultimately providing any other relief considered expedient and just under the facts of...

RASHTRIYA CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 1, 2022)

1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [herein...

TUKARAM PUNDALIK BORADE


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 1, 2022)

1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [herein...


20
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Mar 2024 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Mar 2024 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

22 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2024 (QRMP Taxpayer < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category I States.

* State Category I - Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana or Andhra Pradesh or the Union territories of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Puducherry, Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.

24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2024 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2024) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the FY 2023-24 (For taxpayers upto 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2023-24 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2024 (Rule 61A)