GST Library
2 Col
3 Col

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscribe (Single-user)

Subscribe (Multi-user)

GST News | Updates

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules (Single-view)

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos
GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
About Us
Our Services
Contact Us
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

7827243905

GST Case Laws


Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Sort By
Text Search option

  8,237 Results

XTRACARE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 26, 2021)

M/s. Xtracare Products Private Limited (herein after referred to as “the applicant”), No.725, 6th B Cross, 3rd Block, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560 034 having GSTIN29AAACX0193J1Z2 have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act. 2. The Appli...
:

Classification/Supply of Goods

:

Rates of Tax

ALCOATS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 26, 2021)

M/s. ALCOATS (herein after referred to as “Applicant”}, Plot No.242, Hebbal Industrial Area, Mysuru - 570 018, having GSTIN 29AAHFA7052R1ZS, have filed an application for rectification of mistake (ROM) under Section 102 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 102 of KGST Act, 2017 against the ruling passed by this authority vide Order No. KAR ADRG 62/2021 dated 29/10/2021. 2. The applicant filed the instant application to bring to the notice of this authority, for rectification of ...
:

Job Work

:

Rates of Tax

Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that good were being transported in a truck to Hazrat Nizamuddin Junction in Delhi for their onwards transportation by rail to Nipani in Kartanaka State. However, the vehicle was intercepted and seizure order was passed. The contention is that invoice and bilty were produced by the driver, however,...
:

Demand & Interest

MANUPATRA INFORMATION SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Nov 25, 2021)

1. M/s Manupatra Information Solutions Private Limited, B-37, Sector-1, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar-201301 (here in after referred to as the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN 09AACCM5884H1Z2. 2. The applicant has filed application for advance ruling in Form ARA-01 and submitted as under- (1) they are engaged in providing on-line text based information such as online books, newspapers, periodicals, directories etc (judgements/Notifications/Bare Acts/Rules/E-books/N...
:

Classification/Supply of Services

:

Rates of Tax

ADITHYA AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Nov 25, 2021)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and UPGST Act”) by M/s. Adithya Automotive Applications Pvt Ltd, Vendors Industrial Park, Plot No. T-2, Tata Motors Eastern Complex, Chinhat Industiral Area, Goyala Deva Road, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant”) against the Advance Ruling Order No. UP ADRG 82/...
:

Job Work

:

Rates of Tax

B.S. MINERALS vs. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS


(Orissa High Court | Nov 25, 2021)

01. 1. This is the second writ petition by the same Petitioner i.e. M/s B.S. Minerals on the issue of denial of refund of unutilized input tax credit (ITC) against export of iron ore fines for which the export duty is nil as a result of an exemption notification. 2. In earlier writ petition of the Petitioner i.e. W.P.(C) No.26685 of 2021, the challenge was to two instructions dated 8th June and 25th June 2021 issued by the Joint Commissioner of CT and GST (Law) at Cuttack instructing Circ...
:

Refund

1. The petitioner in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, approaching this Court being aggrieved by an order in Appeal passed by the respondent No.3 and in absence of GST Appellate Tribunal as per the provisions of Section 109 and 110 of the Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, Second Appeal is not feasible to be filed. Refund sanction order passed by the respondent No.2 as aggrieved the petitioner on account of non-payment of the interest thereon. The prayers sou...
:

Refund

OJESH PATI vs. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS


(Orissa High Court | Nov 24, 2021)

1. There are five prayers in the present petition, which read as under: "i. why the action and decision of the Opp.parties shall not be declared illegal, unconstitutional and violative of legal right of the petitioner on account of the Taxes being shared and borne by the petitioner on post enactment goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, thereby infringing the Goods and Service Tax, 2017. ii. the Opp. parties shall not be directed to restitute the benefit of GST to the petitioner along...

RRIBADA FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 24, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. RRIBADA FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. Whether Liable to Pay GST under Normal or under Reverse Charge Mechanism on Import of Services which are not rendered in Indi...
:

Classification/Supply of Services

It is the case of the petitioner that after introduction of GST, a sum of ₹ 5,34,633/- was lying as un-utilized input tax credit in their VAT Account. According to the petitioner, the respondents called upon the petitioner to furnish documents to substantiate the aforesaid transitional credit for a sum of ₹ 5,34,633/-. However, the petitioner was able to furnish invoice only for a sum of ₹ 4,97,585/-. 2. It is the further case of the petitioner that a notice dated 20.11....
:

Transitional Credit