Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      Subscription Plans
🔒 Login    

Composition Scheme under GST

    

Treatment of Job Work in GST and Form ITC-04

    

Paver blocks laid down for parking of cars to avoid quicker wear & tear due to accumulation of water & dust amounts to construction of immovable property and not eligible for GST Input: Says AAR

    

Rule 36(4) - Buyer's ITC at the mercy of supplier?

    

High Court stayed interest, penalty and further investigation of other products of Whirlpool in response to writ filed by them.

    

Poultry Meal to attract 5% GST whereas Poultry Fat to attract 12% GST: Says AAR

    

GST on lease premium charges, annual lease rentals and maintenance charges paid on lease of land for own bulding construction is restricted and not eligible for ITC as per section 17(5)(d): Says AAR

    

Supply of food to Hospital on outsourcing basis to hospital patients shall be chargeable to 5% GST with no input w.e.f. 27.07.2018: Says AAR

    

GST Profiteering of Rs. 1,57,200 established in the case of supply of Duracell Battery AA/6 by respondent.

    

Revocation of GST Registration Applications

    
View all
Subscription Plans   
TaxReply.com - Free Tax updates for All
GST Library
Taxreply tweets
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers New
GST Rates Reckoner
Classification of Goods and Services
Classification of Goods and Services (Search)
Free Trial
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules - Latest Amendments
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Notifications / Circulars Press Releases +
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Case Laws (All) ✓
↳ AAR Orders
↳ AAAR Orders
↳ NAA Orders
↳ High Court Orders
↳ Supreme Court Orders
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
↳ E-way Notifications
↳ E-way Bill News
↳ E-way Bill Rules
↳ E-way Bill FAQ
Finance Bill
GST Case Laws - Advance Search Tool
Total 3,086 cases mapped to 11,375 Sections/Rules/Notifications/HSN
TR Citation -TR-
Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By

Text Search option  


31 Result  

GST Case Laws

UNION OF INDIA... vs. BRAND EQUITY TREATIES LIMITED & ORS.... [2020 (6) TR 2495]

SC | Jun 19, 2020 | Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7425-

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7425-7428/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 11040/2018 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 196/2019 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 8496/2019 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 13203/2019 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) ___________ O R D E R  Issue notice. To be heard along with SLP(C) No. 26626 of 2019 and SLP (C) D. No. 38404 of 2019. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX & ORS.... vs. COMMERCIAL STEEL COMPANY... [2020 (6) TR 2585]

SC | Jun 15, 2020 | Special Leave Petition ( Civil ) Diary N

ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following 1 Mr Venkat Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the High Court was not justified in entertaining a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the purpose of deciding upon the validity of the action initiated by the revenue authorities when an alternate remedy would have been available to the assessee. 2 Moreover, it has been submitted that the entire judgment of the Hig

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.... vs. CHOGORI INDIA RETAIL LIMITED... [2020 (6) TR 2490]

SC | Jun 3, 2020 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 7374/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-08-2019 in WPC No. 762/2019 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) __________________ ORDER Delay condoned. In the facts of the present case, we are not inclined to interfere in this Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed accordingly. However, question of law are kept open. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

SANDEEP GOYAL ... vs. UNION OF INDIA... [2020 (4) TR 2584]

SC | Apr 17, 2020 | Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal

ORDER The allegation against the petitioner is that he has created about 555 fake firms and has committed fraud to the tune of ₹ 74,00,00,000/- (Rupees seventy four crore only). Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned additional solicitor general, submits that the investigation is still pending and more number of fake firms created by the petitioner are being detected. It is not in dispute that the maximum punishment to be imposed on the petitioner, if convicted, is five years. It is also not

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.... vs. ADFERT TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.... [2020 (2) TR 2582]

SC | Feb 28, 2020 | Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal

ORDER In the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are not inclined to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. We accordingly dismiss the Special Leave Petition. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY... vs. HARDCASTLE RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.... [2020 (2) TR 1662]

SC | Feb 19, 2020 | Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos 290-292 of

O R D E R 1. A batch of writ petitions is pending before the High Courts of Delhi, Bombay and Punjab and Haryana in which the constitutional validity of Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Rule 126 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 and other cognate provisions, is under challenge. Twenty writ petitions are pending before the High Court of Delhi. Two writ petitions, which are the subject matter of the present Transfer Petitions, are pending b

UNION OF INDIA... vs. TAX BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS.... [2020 (2) TR 2580]

SC | Feb 10, 2020 | Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3839/

ORDER We do not intend to interfere with the order passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jodhpur. However, we only stay that part of the order which has extended the deadline for submitting the returns. This is on the basis of Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General’s statement to this Court that only ₹ 200/- per day is being charged for the filing of late returns beyond 12.02.2020. He has also assured us that the authorities, both under the Central as well as

HIMANI MUNJAL... vs. UNION OF INDIA... [2020 (1) TR 2579]

SC | Jan 27, 2020 | Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 98

ORDER Considering the fact that offence is punishable with a maximum sentence of five years and the petitioner has already undergone sentence for a period of one year five months and she has a child of three years old, without commenting on the merits of the case, we direct release of the petitioner on bail, in connection with complaint No.35/2018, during the pendency of the trial and her furnishing personal bond for a sum of ₹ 5 Lacs with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfac

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERV... vs. LANTECH PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED... [2020 (1) TR 2581]

SC | Jan 8, 2020 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(

ORDER Delay condoned. Issue notice.

GURDEEP SINGH SACHAR... vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.... [2019 (12) TR 2583]

SC | Dec 13, 2019 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary

O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy granted. Delay condoned. The special leave petitions are dismissed. However, in SLP Diary No. 41632 of 2019, it is open for the Union of India to apply for a review insofar as the GST aspect is concerned before the High Court of Bombay. If this is done within a period of four weeks from today, the review petition will be disposed of on merits. Application for impleadment stands dismissed.