Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Services      GST E-Books
🔒 Login    

Work contract services provided to National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) to be taxable at 18% GST and not 12% GST: Says AAR

    

CBIC tweet for consideration of GST late fee waiver for past period from Aug 2017 to Jan 2020

    

Next GST Council Meeting likely to happen on June 14

    

Principles of natural justice not followed by officer. Assessment order set aside and remitted back for redoing the assessment again on merits of case : Madras High Court

    

Bail Petition of Sh. Rajesh Arora : Rajasthan High Court

    

Retrofitted two wheelers for use of differently abled persons to be taxed as normal vehicle under HSN 87112019 @ 28% GST with ITC : Says AAR, Karnataka

    

GSTN advisory for registration of IRP/RPs on the GST Portal

    

Early hearing of SKH Sheet Metals accepted by Delhi High Court on the issue of availment of transitional credit under GST

    

Petitioner got approval from Bombay High Court to visit the office premises of Petitioner to collect records and information

    

Emaar MGF held guilty for profiteering of Rs. 13 crore upto 31st March 2019: Says NAA

    
View all
GST E-Books   
TaxReply.com - Free Tax updates for All
GST Library
GST News
About GST Library
E-Books
Subscription Plans
Offers
GST Rates Reckoner
Classification of Goods and Services
Classification of Goods and Services (Search)
Free Trial
GST Set-off Calculator
Full Site Search
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules - Latest Amendments
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Notifications / Circulars Press Releases +
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Case Laws (All) ✓
↳ AAR Orders
↳ AAAR Orders
↳ NAA Orders
↳ High Court Orders
↳ Supreme Court Orders
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
↳ E-way Notifications
↳ E-way Bill News
↳ E-way Bill Rules
↳ E-way Bill FAQ
Finance Bill
GST Case Laws - Advance Search Tool
TR Citation -TR-
Court
State
Related Tags New   OR     OR     OR  
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Free-Text Search
Sort By

Text Search option  


1146 Result  

GST Case Laws

SREE SARAVANA ENGINEERING BHAVANI PRIVATE LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) [2020 (5) TR 2322]

HC | Tamilnadu | May 27, 2020 | W.P.No. 7763 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.9132 o

O R D E R This matter is taken up for hearing through Video-Conferencing mode. 2. Mr. M. Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice or the respondent. By consent of both parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of assessment dated 13.05.2020 passed in GSTIN.No.33AANCS3782R1ZG. 4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order was passed in v

RAJESH ARORA vs. UNION OF INDIA [2020 (5) TR 2321]

HC | Rajasthan | May 26, 2020 | S.B. Criminal Misc Petition No. 3987/202

Order Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 15/2018 registered at Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Zonal Unit, Jaipur for offences under Sections 132(1)(B), (C), (D), (F), (I), (L) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2018. Maximum period of sentence that can be awarded in the

SAPHIRE FOODS PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA [2020 (5) TR 2148]

HC | Maharashtra | May 22, 2020 | WP-OSDB-LD-VC-NO.2 of 2020

The petitioner has impugned the summons dated 11th May 2020 issued by the respondent no.3 seeking various information.  2. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties, we have perused the record including reply submitted by the authority which prima facie indicates that the respondents have been seeking information from the petitioner since 6th August 2019. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that some of the information are already furnished. Rest of the informati

SKH SHEET METALS COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [2020 (5) TR 2153]

HC | Delhi | May 22, 2020 | CM APPL. 11279/2020

O R D E R CM APPL. 11279/2020 Present application has been filed for early hearing on the ground that the issue involved in the present case is covered by the judgment in the case of Micromax Informatics Limited Vs. UOI and Ors., W.P. (C) 196/2019 & CM APPL. 965/2019 dated 5th May, 2020 rendered by the learned Predecessor Division Bench of which one of us (HMJ Sanjeev Narula) is the author. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the said judgment credit of

INDIRA PROJECTS & DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER [2020 (5) TR 1666]

HC | Tamilnadu | May 19, 2020 | W.P. No.7604 to 7606 of 2020 and WMP No.

ORDER This matter is taken up for hearing through Video-Conferencing mode. 2. These writ petitions are filed challenging the demand notices issued by the respondent dated 10.03.2020 and 13.03.2020 respectively. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that these writ petitions are filed challenging the demand notices issued in pursuant to the orders of assessment passed relevant to the assessment years 2017-2018, 2018- 2019 and 2019-2020. It is further contende

GAURAV S/O SHRI SAMPAT LAL MAHESHWARI vs. STATE [2020 (5) TR 1650]

HC | Rajasthan | May 13, 2020 | S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No.

ORDER (1) This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with CR No.205/2019, Police Station Udaimandir, District Jodhpur, for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. (2) Mr. Anand Purohit, learned Senior Counsel, submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 30.10.2019 for the offences triable by Magistrate. It is further submitted that the petitioner has given benefit of release on bail by this Cou

SHIV AGRO THROUGH ASHOKKUMAR KANTIBHAI PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [2020 (5) TR 1649]

HC | Gujrat | May 11, 2020 | R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7046 of

1. As the issues raised in all the captioned writ applications are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.7046 of 2020 is treated as the lead matter. 3 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:   “A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any oth

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [2020 (5) TR 1640]

HC | Delhi | May 5, 2020 | W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

1. Bharti Airtel Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘Petitioner’) has preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning inter alia, Rule 61 (5) of the GST Rules, Form GSTR- 3B and Circular No. 26/26/2017-GST (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned circular’) dated 29.12.2017 as ultra vires the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and contrary to Articles 14, 19 and 265 of the Constitution of India. T

PARESH NATHALAL CHAUHAN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [2020 (5) TR 1641]

HC | Gujrat | May 5, 2020 | R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 6237 of

1. This application is filed seeking bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( for short ‘Cr.P.C’) in respect of the offence punishable under Section132(1)(b)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for which complaint being File No. CCST/DCST/ENF-CO/AC-1/Paresh Chauhan Case/ 2019-20 / B-42 came to be registered with office of Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad. 2. The petitioner has been arrested for the offence punisha

BRAND EQUITY TREATIES LIMITED, MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD., DEVELOPER GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, RELIANCE ELEKTRIK WORKS vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [2020 (5) TR 1642]

HC | Delhi | May 5, 2020 | W.P.(C) 11040/2018 and C.M. No. 42982/20

1. All the four writ petitions seek identical relief in the nature of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioners to avail input tax credit of the accumulated CENVAT credit as of 30th June, 2017 by filing declaration Form TRAN-1 beyond the period provided under the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter, the “CGST Rules”). Additionally, petitioners also assail Rule 117 of the CGST Rules on the ground that it is arbitrary, unconstitut