GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill 2024

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

About Us

Our Services

Contact Us

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 120
Hindi
English
Hon'ble Judges:

RAJIV SHAKDHER
TARA VITASTA GANJU
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
Abhishek A Rastogi
Pratyushprava Saha
COUNSEL
Adesh Kumar Tiwari
Vedansh Anand
Harpreet Singh

Writ petition seeking interim relief against GST Summons allowed by High Court 

Key Points raised by Petitioner:

GST Summon to top management should be issued as a last resort.

If information can be obtained from officers working in a company, then top management need not be roped in immediately.

It is that only when the revenue is able to demonstrate that a particular person in the company is involved in infractions or suspected of committing infractions, can summons be issued to the concerned person.

Facts:

This writ petition is directed against the summons issued by Superintendent, Anti-Evasion, CGST.

A perusal of the summons would show, that neither the Document Identification Number (“DIN”) has been mentioned, nor is it specified as to who was required to remain present on the date indicated in the impugned summons.

The date indicated in the summons is 05.05.2022, which has already passed.

Although the petitioner is a company, the summons issued are addressed to the “Proprietor/Director/Partner”.

Obviously, the petitioner, which is a company, does not have a proprietor or partner.

In sum, there is no indication as to the individuals who had to present themselves on the date mentioned in the aforesaid summons.

Petitioner:

Mr. Rastogi (Counsel for Petitioner) further says that the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent, by issuing summons has disregarded the circulars dated 23.12.2019, 26.02.2007 and 20.01.2015, and the guidelines incorporated in the circular dated 05.11.2019.

Mr. Rastogi submits that the summons issued by the respondents were required to indicate the DIN. As per the guidelines, according to Mr. Rastogi, this generates an audit trail and helps in bringing about transparency in the system. Mr. Rastogi emphasized, that if the summons contain DIN, it lends authenticity to the document.

It is also Mr. Rastogi’s contention, that the circulars and guidelines provide for exceptions, albeit, in an emergent situation. However, Mr. Rastogi says the process also requires the respondents to regularise this deficiency.

Besides this, it is also Mr. Rastogi’s contention, that the summons under the aforesaid circulars and guidelines have to be issued as a last resort; the contention being that if information can be obtained from officers working for an entity, then the top management need not be roped in immediately.

The thrust of the argument is that only when the contesting respondents are able to demonstrate that a particular person in the company is involved in infractions or suspected of committing infractions, can summons be issued to the concerned person.

Revenue:

Mr. Singh (Counsel for Revenue) says that one cannot but accept, that the circulars and guidelines are binding on respondents/revenue.

It is Mr. Singh’s stand before us that in future, if summons are issued, regard will be had to the aforementioned circulars and guidelines framed in that behalf.

Mr. Singh further submits, that if summons are served on the Petitioner’s employee for furnishing information or to seek his presence before the concerned officer and if a request is made that the employee summoned would be represented through an authorised agent, such request will be considered and in case such a request is declined, reasons for the same will be furnished.

Held by High Court:

Having regard to the statement made by Mr. Singh, which is in line with the contents of the aforementioned circulars and guidelines, we are inclined to dispose of the writ petition based on the statement made by Mr. Singh.


:

Summon

Best-in-class
Digital GST Library
Plan starts from
₹ 3,960/-
(For 1 Year)
Checkout all Plans
Unlimited access for
365 Days
✓ Subscribe Now
Author:

TaxReply


Aug 10, 2022


Post your comment here !

Login to Comment


GST News (Updates)


  Read more GST updates...

29
Mar
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Mar

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Feb 2024 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Feb 2024 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Mar

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Feb 2024 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Mar

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Feb 2024 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Feb 2024 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Feb 2024 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Mar

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Feb 2024 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Feb 2024 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Mar

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Feb 2024 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Mar

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Feb 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

31 Mar

☑ Annual | CMP-02

Last date to opt-in from regular scheme to composition scheme under GST for FY 2024-25 [Rule - 3 of CGST Rules.]

☑ Annual | GTA

Closing Date of window on GST Portal for Opt-in / Opt-out for Forward Charge / Reverse Charge by GTA for FY 2024-25 [Notification No.06/2023 - CT(R) dated 26.07.2023]