Payment Failure - GST Library by
Home      Free WhatsApp Updates      Have a Query?      Other Services      Vacancy for Article
Login | Register    

Tax Audit due date extension AY 2019-20


GST Council 37th Meeting Update


Corporate tax rates slashed to 22% for domestic companies and 15% for new domestic manufacturing companies and other fiscal reliefs


Fake Input and refund of IGST on exports - crackdown by DGGI and DRI


GST Council may Scrap GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C for FY 17-18 for small taxpayers upto 5 crore turnover


Changes in 36th GST Council Meeting held on 27th July 2019


CMP-08 due date for quarter April 2019 to June 2019 extended till 31st July 2019


Press Release restricting the last date for availing ITC for FY 2017-18 is illegal : Gujarat High Court


Budget 2019 Highlights - 05 July 2019


Transfer of GST amount from one head to other head (Form GST PMT - 09)


DGGST arrests one person for availing and passing fake ITC of Rs.16 Crore.


Notification issued to extend the date of blocking and unblocking on e-way bill facility to 21.08.2019.


Press Release of 35th GST Council Meeting held on 21st June 2019


Issues reported in filing Form GSTR 9C by the taxpayers : Advisory by Team GSTN


Issues reported in filing Form GSTR 9 by the taxpayers: Advisory by Team GSTN


New GST Return Transition Phase applicable from Oct 2019


Latest amendments in GST enacted on 07.03.2019


Recommendations of the 33rd GST Council meeting held on 24.02.2019


GSTR-3B due date for January 2019 has been extended upto 22.02.2019


New GST Input-Output Set off Rules w.e.f. 01.02.2019

     View all
View all
Home       Login    Pay - Free Tax updates for All
GST Library TM
About GST Library
GST Library Pricing
Free Trial
Full Site Search
GST Act / Rules
GST Act / Rules - Latest Amendments
GST Amendment Statistics
GST Notifications / Circulars Press Releases +
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
GST Case Laws
↳ GST AAR Orders
↳ GST AAAR Orders
↳ GST NAA Orders
GST Forms   
E-way Bill
↳ E-way Bill Notificaitons
↳ E-way Bill News
↳ E-way Bill Rules
↳ E-way Bill FAQ
GST Rates for goods and services
GST Set-off Calculator
GST News / Articles
Finance Bill

The Delhi high court has stayed the Rs 462-crore demand made on Hindustan Unilever (HUL) by the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA). The HC has directed NAA that no coercive action be taken, and no penalty proceedings be continued against HUL until the final determination of the matter in the court. According to a statement by HUL, since the matter involves some issues that require a detailed examination of contentions of both the parties, the HC has asked the FMCG major to deposit Rs 90 crore in two instalments (Rs 50 crore by March 15, and Rs 40 crore by May 15) in the Consumer Welfare Fund. 

NAA had, in its order dated December 24, 2018, concluded that HUL did not pass on the entire benefit to consumers when GST was reduced from 28% to 18% on home and personal care products in November 2017. According to NAA’s estimation, HUL profiteered around Rs 535 crore, of which Rs 455 crore was denial of benefit to consumers. A few companies that have been served anti-profiteering notices by NAA have obtained stay orders from the court. These include Hardcastle Restaurants, which is the franchisee of McDonald’s, and Pyramid Infrastructure. HUL has maintained that GST is a progressive reform that will benefit consumers and the industry at large. 

However, in the absence of set rules and guidelines on profiteering, the company has gone by the spirit of the law, and passed on the entire benefit received under GST to consumers — either through reduction in prices or through increase in grammage. During the transitionary period, HUL suo moto offered to pay to the government the benefits that accrued to the company, but could not be passed on to consumers. This amount aggregating to Rs 160 crore (including Rs 36 crore on behalf of redistribution stockists), has since been deposited with the Consumer Welfare Fund of the government.

Download Full order passed by NAA in case of HUL
ID: 484 | Date 17-01-2019 | Posted By:

CA Mohit Jain


please arrange to send this HUL order in the matter of anti profiteering.

Comment By: RASIK PATEL | Date: 29-01-2019

Your Reply