GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

GST e-books



Tax Domains Sale

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Tamilnadu ✔

  2,006 Results

ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order of provisional attachment of property under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 vide FORM GST DRC-22 dated 13.02.2024, on the premise that it suffers from manifest arbitrariness and in excess of the respondent's jurisdiction under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act” or “the CGST Act”). 2. Brief Facts: 2.1. The petitioner is a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 26.07.2024 passed by the respondent. 2. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had filed an appeal against the order-in-original dated 26.07.2024 before the respondent. Howe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Mr.U.Baranidaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (T) who takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order passed by the respondent dated 12.04.2024, whereby, the proposal contained in the show cause notice for reversal of ITC credit of Rs.18...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr.S.Ramamurthy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 25.04.2024 passed by the respondent and to quash the same. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing reference No.GDN No.1344/2024-2025 in form Mov-09 dated 09.01.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same and further to direct the respondent to release the consignment and appropriately compensate the petitioner for the loss incurred. 2. The case of the petitioner is that they sold an old KOBELCO SD520 Excavator to M/s.Stone Factory on 01.01.2025 and ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.S.Raman, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate (T), who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in W.P.No. 3993 of 2025 is to the order passed by the first respondent under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 23.05.2024 relating to the assessment year 2019-20. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of Groceries, Provisions and General Goods and is registered under Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner had filed its return and paid appropriate taxes. However, during the scrutiny of the petitioner's monthly return, the following defects were noti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 16.08.2024 on the premise that the petitioner had not submitted its reply when, in fact, the petitioner had submitted its reply on 18.10.2023 in response to the notice in DRC-01 dated 13.07.2023. It was thus submitted that the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind to the material on record. 2. The petitioner is a civil works contractor. The petitioner is registere...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER This writ petition has been filed challenging the order in original dated 23.02.2022 and order in Appeal dated 29.07.2022 passed by second respondent and confirmed by the first respondent respectively that demanded the petitioner to pay GST liability along with interest and full penalty for GST liability. 2. Heard Mr. Joseph Prabhakar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. R. Gowri Shankar, learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents . 3. Mr. J...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 10.10.2023 relating to the assessment year 2017- 18. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of providing rental services of immovable property and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period of 2017-18, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on scrutiny of the petitioner's return, it was notic...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
Feb
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Feb

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Jan 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).