GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

GST e-books



Tax Domains Sale

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Gujrat ✔

  1,311 Results

GOODLUCK INDIA LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 3, 2025)

ORDER ( PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA ) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Abhishek Rastogi through video conference with learned advocate Mr.Bhavesh B. Chokshi for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Deepak N. Khanchandani for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Learned advocates for the parties were heard exhaustively on 24.01.2025. As the Court was not inclined to interfere with the matter, time was sought by the learned advocate for the petitioner to take instructions and therefore, the matter was adjourned to today. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that he has instruction to invite an order on merits. Thereafter, the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE ..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 29, 2025)

Brief facts: Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (India) Private Limited, 4th floor A-401, 4th floor, Star Residency, Vasna Bhayli Road, Bhayli, Vadodara, Gujarat 391410 now known as Thyssenkrupp Uhde India Private Limited] is engaged in Engineering, Procurement and Construction (‘EPC’) jobs, as well as Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management services in the areas of Ammonia Storages, Nitric Acid, Urea, DMT etc. and is also involved in the setting up of Chlor Alkali...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Punit B. Juneja for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh R. Sharma for the respondent. 2. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondent to refund the compensation cess that has gone into as an input to the goods exported in the Financial Year 2017-2018 as per the provisions of section 54 of the Cen...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RIDDHI ENTERPRISE.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 22, 2025)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and the ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 wou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DOMS INDUSTRIES P LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 22, 2025)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Act, 2017' and the 'GGST Act, 2017') are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 would also ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DATA PROCESSING FORMS P LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 22, 2025)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Act, 2017' and the 'GGST Act, 2017') are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 would also ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMDEV FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 22, 2025)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Act, 2017' and 'GGST Act, 2017') are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 would also mean...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GSPC (JPDA) LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 22, 2025)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Act, 2017' and the 'GGST Act, 2017') are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 would also ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Tarak Damani for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah for respondent No. 1. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “8(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus and hold that the Show Cause Notice dated 09.07.2024 (Annexure A) issued by the Respondent Authoritie...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
Feb
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Feb

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Jan 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).