GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 122

STATE TAX OFFICER vs. M/S. BONNE SANTE
(National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.N.SHARMA
J.C.CHAUHAN
AMAND SHAH
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
Na
COUNSEL
Neeraj Rai

Petitioner / Applicant

STATE TAX OFFICER

Respondent M/S. BONNE SANTE
Court

NAA (National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Date Mar 13, 2020
Order No.

17/2020

TR Citation 2020 (3) TR 1281
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

ORDER

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 13.09.2019, received on 16.09.2019 by this Authority, has been furnished by Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti Profiteering on 27.03.2019 by the DGAP with a recommendation to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1, originally examined by the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules 2017. The Applicant No. 1 has alleged profiteering, in respect of restaurant service supplied by the Respondent (Franchisee of M/s Subway Systems India Pvt. Ltd.). It was alleged that despite the reduction in the rate of GST from 18% to 5% w.e.f. 15.11.2017, the Respondent had increased the base prices of his products and had not passed on the commens....
Download Full Judgement :
29
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S