GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

MADHESH @ MADESAN vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, (FAC) , KRISHNAGIRI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Pet. Counsel
M.r. Jothimanian
Elavarasan M.r.
Res. Counsel
Amrita Dinakaran

Petitioner / Applicant

MADHESH @ MADESAN

Respondent THE STATE TAX OFFICER, (FAC) , KRISHNAGIRI
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Dec 21, 2024
Order No.

W. P. No. 36027 of 2024

Citation

2024(12) TAXREPLY 12115

Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA

ORDER

ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging GST MOV-02 dated 29.10.2024 and GST MOV-07 dated also the same date. The short question is whether the proceedings under Section 129(3) can be sustained in the absence of complying with the time line mandated under Section 129(3). It is the case of the petitioner that the goods were detained on 29.10.2024 and notice under Section 129(3) of the Act, 2017 in Form GST MOV-07 was issued on 29.10.2024. However, till date there is no order of detention made in Form GST MOV-09 which is in gross violation of the time line stipulated under Section 129(3) of the Act. It is submitted that in terms of Sub Section (3) to Section 129 order of detention in GST MOV-9 ought to have been made within seven days from the date of the issuance of show cause notice. It is submitted that the failure to adhere to the time lines stipulated in Section 129(3) of the Act, would result in vitiating the proceedings. 2. In this regard, petitioner has rel....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
9
Feb
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Jan 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Jan 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Jan 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Jan 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Feb

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Jan 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).