GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 122

M/S JACKPOT EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUNITA AGARWAL
BHANOT
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
Atul Kumar Shahi
COUNSEL
Ramesh Chandra Shukla

Petitioner / Applicant

M/S JACKPOT EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED

Respondent UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Sep 1, 2020
Order No.

Writ Tax No. - 424 of 2020

TR Citation 2020 (9) TR 3293
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)
Related Tags :

ORDER

Heard Sri Atul Kumar Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent department. Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to obtain instructions for a period of two months. His prayer for further one week time to obtain instructions is therefore turned down. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.09.2019 of provisional attachment of the property under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "Act of 2017"). The submission is that on a spot inspection of the business premises of the petitioner, some dispute was raised by the department with regard to the registration of the place of business which was changed during the course of time. In order to protect the interest of revenue and in exercise of powers under Section 83 of the Act of 2017 the competent authority had ordered for provisional attachment of the business accoun....
Download Full Judgement :
29
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S