GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT New

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
Translate by TaxGPT: 

M.S. STEEL AND PIPES vs. ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER, COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
Pet. Counsel
Harisankar V. Menon
Meera V.menon
Res. Counsel
Thushara James

Petitioner / Applicant

M.S. STEEL AND PIPES
Respondent ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER, COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Aug 12, 2020
Order No.

W.P(C).No.16356 OF 2020

Citation

2020(8) TAXREPLY 3216
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 series of notices of detention, whereby a consignment of goods transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent on the allegation that there was a discrepancy in the e-way bill that accompanied the transportation of the goods. On a perusal of Ext.P4 series of notice, I find that the reason for detention was that, while the consignment was supported by an invoice which contained the details of the goods transported as also the tax paid in respect of the goods, there was no mention of the tax amounts separately in the e-way bill that accompanied the goods. The respondents therefore detained the goods on the ground that there was no valid e-way bill, supporting the transportation in question. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that there is no requirement under the Act and Rules for mentioning the tax amount separately in the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 that the petition....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
24
Jan
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Jan

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Oct - Dec 2024 (QRMP Taxpayer < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category I States.  [Due date extended vide Notification No.02/2025 dated 10.01.2025]

* State Category I - Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana or Andhra Pradesh or the Union territories of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Puducherry, Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.

26 Jan

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Oct - Dec 2024 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  [Due date extended vide Notification No.02/2025 dated 10.01.2025]

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

28 Jan

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Dec 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

31 Jan

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (Rule 61A)