GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Evasion in India

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services


GST e-books

GST Domains Sale

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Join on twitter

Join GST Group 122

KERALA STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. M/S. PHILLIPS INDIA LTD.
(National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.N.SHARMA
J.C.CHAUHAN
AMAND SHAH
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
A.shainamol
Anwar Ali
COUNSEL
Harish Chawla
Gaurav Gulati
Manish Singh

Petitioner / Applicant

KERALA STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERING

Respondent M/S. PHILLIPS INDIA LTD.
Court

NAA (National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Date May 19, 2020
Order No.

27/2020

TR Citation 2020 (5) TR 2474
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

ORDER

ORDER 1. The present report dated 26.09.2018, has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 vide the minutes of it’s meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the supply of “Food Processor” (HSN: 85094090), by not passing on the benefit of GST at the time of implementation of the GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017. It was also alleged that the Respondent had indulged in profiteering in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. In this regard, the above Applicant had relied on two invoices issued by the Respondent, one dated 09.05.2017 (Pre-GST) and the other dated 22.12.2017 (Post-GST). 2. The above reference was examined by the Standing Committee on....
Download Full Judgement :
29
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S