GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Contact Us

Subscription Plans

GSTR-9 Manual New

GSTR-9C Manual New

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

Act & Rules (E-book)

GST Rates

GST Rates (E-book)

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd
®
Subscribe Free GST updates on...

@taxreply

Join GST Group 125

FOCUZ CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENTS (A DIVISION OF FOCUZ CORPORATION PVT LTD) vs. THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) STATE GOODS AND SERVICE AND OTHER
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
N
T
COUNSEL
S.k.devi
COUNSEL
Thushara James

Petitioner / Applicant

FOCUZ CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENTS (A DIVISION OF FOCUZ CORPORATION PVT LTD)
Respondent THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) STATE GOODS AND SERVICE AND OTHER
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Aug 20, 2020
Order No.

WP (C). No. 17250 OF 2020 (E)

Citation 2020(8) TaxReply 3266
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the detention of a consignment of construction equipments, that was being transported at his instance. On a perusal of Ext.P7 notice it is seen that the objection of the 1 st respondent is essentially with regard to the documents that had to accompany the transportation of the goods. It is the specific case of the 1 st respondent that the documents did not reflect the transaction covered by the transportation that was apprehended. On a perusal of Ext.P7 notice, I find that the detention by the 1 st respondent cannot be said to be unjustified. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondent. 3. Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, I direct the 1st respondent to release the goods and the vehicle to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the amount mentioned in Ext.P7 notice. The respondents shall, t....
Download Full Judgement :
18
Sep
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Sep

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Aug 2024 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Aug 2024 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Sep

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Aug 2024 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Sep

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Aug 2024 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).